MSI beats Mo Co

[dblas]

wish they had to use their own money and not ours. This is way I hope MSI gets a lot of money-- would be from us and all the cucks and Karens out there, as well

I wish they would to, I also wish the payout came from the county council, county exec, and the cucks and karens, but not us.

 

[BurkeM]

Ok...I guess that makes sense. I took it as not going to Mission at all...which does not compute.

Also...it now makes more sense that the Westminister Mission displays an MSI sticker (whether they know it or not).

They know, and management loves MSI

 

[BurkeM]

Gotcha. Hadn't thought of it in those terms. I'm afraid BGOS has me feeling like it never ends, no matter what. I think part of what gets me on this one is that it seems to a layman watching it all go down, that basically the ruling is saying the County law is inconsistent with State law and can't preempt the greater State law, and it seems like that has already been established numerous other times in other cases, so at what point should they not be filing the appeal, because there is already enough precedent to say this is going nowhere?

They appealed because fighting for their ideology has no downside for them, next November's elections.

 

[emerald]

@dblas

Thanks for the rundown/break out!

 

[emerald]

They appealed because fighting for their ideology has no downside for them, next November's elections.

Yes. And as others have pointed out, if they had to put their own dollars on the table...

 

[Schipperke]

They are doing their job by defending their client (the County), as far as they are able to, until all appeals run out. It's called the judicial process, and it applies equally to everyone.

It is no issue with taxpayers bearing the costs. So the state and county are a bit more equal than an adversary with limited finances. Doesn't apply here, but Government has been cited for abuse of process, intentionally running up fees of the defendant through unnecessary interrogatories, discovery, depositions etc..

 

[babalou]

I wish they would to, I also wish the payout came from the county council, county exec, and the cucks and karens, but not us.

Agree 100%

 

[Sunrise]

 

[TheBert]

I once told a rude woman that they were conflicted between the feminism that told them they didn't need a man to open the door and complaining about the patriarchy while benefiting from it by having the door opened for them.

Dead silence.

I once told a rude woman that she was conflicted between the feminism that told her she didn't need a man to open the door and complaining about the patriarchy while benefiting from it by having the door opened for her.

 

[Sunrise]

I once told a rude woman that she was conflicted between the feminism that told her she didn't need a man to open the door and complaining about the patriarchy while benefiting from it by having the door opened for her.

Thank you.

 

[kmittleman]

So at the end of the day, are we free to carry in MoCo or is the County also appealing that decision ?

 

[Sunrise]

So at the end of the day, are we free to carry in MoCo or is the County also appealing that decision ?

@esqappellate

 

[swinokur]

The county is appealing but no stay has been issued.

Carry on

 

[Abagnale]

I'll just continuing carrying screw em! Eat me!

 

[Bob A]

EBMD/MRI
CMC

If some poor soul takes the fall for these unconstitutional infringements, he might have standing for massive Civil Rights damages. (Of course he might die of old age before seeing the final result).

Weigh the risk of arrest vs the risk of death, and the risk of remaining in MD vs the costs of moving to America. Then act accordingly.

 

[esqappellate]

@esqappellate

The County is appealing its loss, but has not sought a stay of the decision pending its appeal. So the injunction against enforcement is in effect. Permit holders can carry in the County if they do so in accordance with State law.

 

[Sunrise]

The County is appealing its loss, but has not sought a stay of the decision pending its appeal. So the injunction against enforcement is in effect. Permit holders can carry in the County if they do so in accordance with State law.

Thanks!

 

[swinokur]

Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland, 8:21-cv-01736 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland, 8:21-cv-01736 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

 

[eruby]

Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland, 8:21-cv-01736 - CourtListener.com

Docket for Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. v. Montgomery County, Maryland, 8:21-cv-01736 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

I'm stoopid

Is this good news?

ORDER of USCA Granting motion for abeyance and Places this case in abeyance pending resolution by the Maryland appellate courts of the County's appeal of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland's Memorandum Decision and Order, Declaratory Judgment Order, and Order Granting Injunctive Relief as to 84 Notice of Appeal, filed by Andrew Raymond, I.C.E. Firearms & Defensive Training, LLC, Joshua Edgar, Carlos Rabanales, Deryck Weaver, Nancy David, Brandon Ferrell, Maryland Shall Issue, Inc., Engage Armament LLC, Eliyahu Shemony, Ronald David. (slss, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/22/2024)

 

[BurkeM]

ORDER of USCA Granting motion for abeyance and Places this case in abeyance pending resolution by the Maryland appellate courts of the County's appeal of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland's Memorandum Decision and Order, Declaratory Judgment Order, and Order Granting Injunctive Relief as to Notice of Appeal, filed by Andrew Raymond, I.C.E. Firearms & Defensive Training, LLC, Joshua Edgar, Carlos Rabanales, Deryck Weaver, Nancy David, Brandon Ferrell, Maryland Shall Issue, Inc., Engage Armament LLC, Eliyahu Shemony, Ronald David. (slss, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/22/2024)