jmcgonig
Active Member
Just read the 35 page MSI doc. Good read. Anyone have an ideal of when the next step occurs?
I posted this in an earlier post. So now you have broken 2 laws.One county and one stateIncorrect. State law allows the State Police to limit the scope of the permit and then provides that any carry with a permit outside such limits is the same as having no permit at all. All the permits issued by the State Place bear the limitation that the permit is "not valid where firearms are prohibited by law." Any law, including presumptively County law.
It will be finished briefing on January 9. After that, up to the JudgeThanks for all the work you do, Mark. How long does the court have to rule on the emergency motion?
Thanks!Just finished reading the filing, well done Mark.
sure, in places. go to google maps, enter the address and use the measurement tool (right click menu) to draw a 100 yard arc.Any places of public assembly around E Gude Dr?
is there a time limit for the judge to decide if he will honor the TRO?It will be finished briefing on January 9. After that, up to the Judge
Thank You very much, Mark. Great Job.It will be finished briefing on January 9. After that, up to the Judge
Those are just for the Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, not for the final order. Nibbling off the worst pieces of the law at the start, go for the whole apple at the end.If I understand the alternative, it basically says you can't carry at any of the listed places, but the 100 yard thing goes away so you don't have to worry about streets? Is that accurate?
I was all excited until I saw proposed
The proposed is designed to get something in a tro right away and is the product of the judge’s resistance to doing any tro as evidenced at the conference yesterday. It is a temporary partial fix. The final relief sought remains much broaderIf I understand the alternative, it basically says you can't carry at any of the listed places, but the 100 yard thing goes away so you don't have to worry about streets? Is that accurate?
I was all excited until I saw proposed
Yep, understand that. Both options give us the ability to carry again at least.Those are just for the Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, not for the final order. Nibbling off the worst pieces of the law at the start, go for the whole apple at the end.
exactlyThose are just for the Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, not for the final order. Nibbling off the worst pieces of the law at the start, go for the whole apple at the end.
That's disappointing that they are resistant to this. Seems straightforward. Thanks for all of your effort!The proposed is designed to get something in a tro right away and is the product of the judge’s resistance to doing any tro as evidenced at the conference yesterday. It is a temporary partial fix. The final relief sought remains much broader
A pi and a tro motion are by their nature on a fast track. But the time of the ruling is up to the judgeis there a time limit for the judge to decide if he will honor the TRO?
I read somewhere he has 21 days to respond but that could of been DC.
In short we're looking at another 6-7 weeks of this im guessing
Thank you for fighting the good fight and getting out here to the forums