Blackstar65
Ultimate Member
- Jun 27, 2010
- 1,002
ok, the point was there were issues which Glock fixed. But this has nothing to do with the current problems
Correct.
ok, the point was there were issues which Glock fixed. But this has nothing to do with the current problems
It always seemed silly to me how county PD's select their service pistols. How can Howard, Montgomery, PG, and Anne Arundel each come to a different conclusion that gun X is best for their department? Seems like a lot of wasted effort. How much time, money and effort are wasted testing a gun when the same results can found from hundreds of police departments across the country?
I know nothing of this but I would guess manufacturer incentives also affect vendor selection. Some manufactures might offer more favorable pricing and incentives than others.
Sometimes it's not just the actual gun.
How much do you know about the process used to select duty firearms? Our needs are different. Some of our requirements are different. Budgets are vastly different. Staffing is different. Its easier to change direction in smaller departments sometimes. Geography also affects selection. Along with performance during evaluation and a bit of personal preference. Oh an manufacture location (Beretta/PGPD) (H&K/Louden County PD), (MSP STATE TEAM/Fulton Armory). The process is more involved them you think.
Now I would not mind have a annual or bi-annual state firearms manufacture day where the major players bring their wears to be shot an evaluated by perspective departments. Currently we have to set up our own demo days.
Just heard about this switch a couple of days ago from a MoCo officer.
His G22 is well over ten years old and is essentially now two-tone.
Issues stemmed around broken rails AND worn down firing pin safeties (one resulted in an AD at the range/training center......while holstered in a level 3 retention holster! With witnesses!). Inspections revealed about 5% had the broken rails and close to 50% had FPS not up to spec. Glock admitted the the .40 and .357 Sig are harder on their guns, reducing frame life. So they are switching to G17, 19, and 26. I believe Gen 4. And I believe the Gold Dot G2 will be the duty round. Tru Glo NS will be standard.
I missed that one. That can be a really big factor. Glock was giving departments $200 per pistol to switch to Glock. A Glock 17 or G22 with night sights is somewhere near 400 to 450. So you can refit your department for half the cost. That is hard to pass up from a budgetary stand point.
Loose lips sink ships.
Just heard about this switch a couple of days ago from a MoCo officer.
His G22 is well over ten years old and is essentially now two-tone.
Issues stemmed around broken rails AND worn down firing pin safeties (one resulted in an AD at the range/training center......while holstered in a level 3 retention holster! With witnesses!). Inspections revealed about 5% had the broken rails and close to 50% had FPS not up to spec. Glock admitted the the .40 and .357 Sig are harder on their guns, reducing frame life. So they are switching to G17, 19, and 26. I believe Gen 4. And I believe the Gold Dot G2 will be the duty round. Tru Glo NS will be standard.
I know nothing of this but I would guess manufacturer incentives also affect vendor selection. Some manufactures might offer more favorable pricing and incentives than others.
Sometimes it's not just the actual gun.
You are telling me that the MoCo PD is too cheap to replace their weapons on a 5 year schedule rather than a 10 to 15 year or more schedule? Everything wears out, uniforms, flashlights, shoes, cars, and firearms. All should be replaced on a regular basis.
So its a money thing and not a performance thing? Why don't the various law enforcement organizations use the same handgun that the Army selects?
It seems like all duty guns break at some point. We had Beretta Centurions in 9mm. The locking blocks started breaking. Then we switched to the Beretta Brigadier in 9mm. Then we adopted the Glock 9mm. Then we switched to the Glock .40. Now we've come full circle. Wtf.
It's true most of our service guns only see a couple of hundred rounds a year for qualifications. That doesn't seem like a high round count even after 10 or so years.