MGA Gun Control 2023

[welder516]

Almost everywhere, you can drive around in your car legally.

Yeah but i can't stop and get gas or eat SMH what a bunch of dumb Bastards

 

[Mister F]

Some of this doesn’t even pass what Heller covered. This is 3 pages of dog poop smeared on paper to say they “pre filed” something.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[eruby]

Yeah but i can't stop and get gas or eat SMH what a bunch of dumb Bastards

Sure you can

WWNC

 

[welder516]

Sure you can

WWNC

 

[Maki]

Didn’t Jerseys just get struck down? I don’t see this sticking around long before there’s an injunction filed against it.

 

[Stoveman]

This POS was pre-filed back in August, before the NY/NJ cases. He/she/them/it could pull it at anytime but they are either too lazy or stupid to do so.

 

[swinokur]

This portion was in the NY CCIA that Federal Judge Suddath just threw out. Then NY ran to the 2CA to get it stayed. The plaintiffs have now asked SCOTUS to lift the stay and I expect Sotomayor to do it or they will then go straight to Thomas to get it lifted

It has zero chance of survival as written

 

[Bertfish]

This POS was pre-filed back in August, before the NY/NJ cases. He/she/them/it could pull it at anytime but they are either too lazy or stupid to do so.

Think they care? You know they don't

 

[Michael S]

No way, If this passes my safe is within a 100 feet of a park. No way this gets to become law.

 

[Mister F]

No way, If this passes my safe is within a 100 feet of a park. No way this gets to become law.

Exactly. There are already too many places that already don’t align with the Heller finding, not even addressing Bruen.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Mister F]

No way, If this passes my safe is within a 100 feet of a park. No way this gets to become law.

Exactly. There are already too many places that already don’t align with the Heller finding, not even addressing Bruen.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[fabsroman]

I'm law abiding, but I'll roll the dice on this one. First offense would likely be a PBJ anyways, even if it didn't go to the stet docket (inactive - prosecutor won't move forward with the case) or if it wasn't nolle prossed out of the gate.

Depends where you get charged. MoCo, you really think you are getting a Nolle or Stet? Maybe a PBJ. Same goes for PG. Might stand a little better of a chance in Anne Arundel, Howard, Frederick, and Baltimore Counties, but not by much.

 

[Bertfish]

No way, If this passes my safe is within a 100 feet of a park. No way this gets to become law.

It'll pass I bet and they'll have to be beaten in court

 

[erwos]

It'll pass I bet and they'll have to be beaten in court

Maybe. We've had some success fighting out things that are egregiously bad at the state level. I do think some of it will come to pass, of course.

 

[K-Romulus]

I’m not seeing a law enforcement exemption? Maybe this is just symbolic, with only one(1) co-sponsor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Muleskinner]

All they do is take away the ability of law abiding citizens to defend themselves. A person willing to violate laws against murder doesn’t give a damn about laws against carrying a gun.

Dipshits.

Ya gotta stop equating gun control to public safety. They want to take away your 2A rights for 1 reason...because an unarmed population is easier to control....period...If it were about public safety empirical evidence shows that guns deter or stop crime far more than guns used to commit crime...they know this....and ignore it because it doesn't fir their agenda.
Obviously any and all of this will be challenged..which costs money. They will simply continue to take until 2A advocates cannot afford to challenge them and they win...again...they are playing the long game...but they excel at it..

 

[thomfantomas]

These would basically be the duty to not carry-period.

This is beyond unconstitution!

 

[FrankZ]

I'm sure the state has no plans to enforce this.

 

[Park ranger]

Is Senator Lee now secretary of state?

 

[teratos]

Ya gotta stop equating gun control to public safety. They want to take away your 2A rights for 1 reason...because an unarmed population is easier to control....period...If it were about public safety empirical evidence shows that guns deter or stop crime far more than guns used to commit crime...they know this....and ignore it because it doesn't fir their agenda.
Obviously any and all of this will be challenged..which costs money. They will simply continue to take until 2A advocates cannot afford to challenge them and they win...again...they are playing the long game...but they excel at it..

I know. They get me side-tracked when they pass it under the guise of public safety.