May need another .380

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Threeband

    The M1 Does My Talking
    Dec 30, 2006
    25,338
    Carroll County
    What is your prefered carry ammo for the G42?

    I recently bought a bunch of this stuff for my Little Crappy Pistol.


    I had been carrying Critical Defense, but I never felt too warm and fuzzy about .380, and after I shot most of the CD, I decided to switch to the Underwood Phillips Screwdriver rounds.

    It's on sale right now. Follow my link if you're interested.
    20230807_192204.jpg
     
    Last edited:

    teratos

    My hair is amazing
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Jan 22, 2009
    59,840
    Bel Air
    Still carrying the G42 about 50% of the time(G48 the rest of the time). I carry it with the 6+1 standard mag and carry a second extended mag. I find it very friendly to shoot, even with my longish hands/fingers. So far it's been 100% reliable through 400 rounds and very accurate with its original sights, especially considering I normally shoot red dots.
    H&K will be releasing their modular micro-compact in the next few months. You can try mine…
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,965
    Socialist State of Maryland
    I have switched to the Underwood ammo for both .380 and 9mm (pocket pistol) based on the videos I have watched. They give a much better permanent wound channel than traditional ammo and also give better penetration. While I liked Critical Defense, most of the time they don't penetrate far enough. In many of the videos I watched, hollow points rarely opened from small guns and still did not give good penetration.
     

    RFBfromDE

    W&C MD, UT, PA
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 21, 2022
    12,745
    The Land of Pleasant Living
    I need to change videos.

    I found Critical Defense and Sig V-Crowns to be the most reliable in expansion, function, availability and cost.

    The GS are right up there but I rarely see them.

    I tried some Underwood in my .38 revolver and it was .357-like. Nah.
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,297
    That's the Major issue with .380 generally , and partial issue with subcompact 9x19 .

    Notably hotter ammo ( to get sub compact actual velocity similar to standard ammo in standard length bbls ) is indeed one approach , and Underwood is indeed speedy .

    But it can be a two edged sword . Lightweight Subcompacts already are difficult to shoot quickly and accurately. The trade offs with extra hot ammo must be evaluated on case by case basis , in Your Hand , in Your Gun .

    I"m sure John From MD is already on top of this , but I"m bringing up for the benefit of the overall membership.
     

    babalou

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 12, 2013
    16,179
    Glenelg
    Depending on how often you help out new shooters - especially the ladies - consider keeping a S&W M&P EZ in .380 around. Butter to load and shoot.
    fondled one at United Gun Shop and loved it. It did not have the thumb safety.
     

    babalou

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 12, 2013
    16,179
    Glenelg
    I recently bought a bunch of this stuff for my Little Crappy Pistol.


    I had been carrying Critical Defense, but I never felt too warm and fuzzy about .380, and after I shot most of the CD, I decided to switch to the Underwood Phillips Screwdriver rounds.

    It's on sale right now. Follow my link if you're interested. View attachment 425957
    Love underwood stuff but they are always out of stock.
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,297
    Seriously though , compact .380 may be a niche particularly suitable for " Phillips screwdriver tip " bullets .

    The mechanics of fluid dynamics are more linear with velocity , and not have two abrupt cut off points of conventional JHP . Ie very narrow window of velocity between no expansion and too much expansion in .380 .

    IF I were to ever go back to .380 , I would be testing several of the these .
     

    John from MD

    American Patriot
    MDS Supporter
    May 12, 2005
    22,965
    Socialist State of Maryland
    That's the Major issue with .380 generally , and partial issue with subcompact 9x19 .

    Notably hotter ammo ( to get sub compact actual velocity similar to standard ammo in standard length bbls ) is indeed one approach , and Underwood is indeed speedy .

    But it can be a two edged sword . Lightweight Subcompacts already are difficult to shoot quickly and accurately. The trade offs with extra hot ammo must be evaluated on case by case basis , in Your Hand , in Your Gun .

    I"m sure John From MD is already on top of this , but I"m bringing up for the benefit of the overall membership.
    That is true. You can't get away from physics. Once I have proved a pocket gun reliable, usually about 200 rounds for me, I don't routinely shoot them at the range. The one exception to this is my Diamondback DB9 Gen4 which I have been shooting a lot to try to get more people to buy them and get the aftermarket accessories to take notice.

    One thing to beware of with the Underwood ammo is a POI change. When sighted in with traditional ammo, neither my Diamondback nor my P365 will shoot the 68 grain Underwood Extreme Penetrators to POI. They impact at 7 oclock about three inches from the center of the target. This may have something to do with the short barrels.
     

    Biggfoot44

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 2, 2009
    33,297
    One thing to beware of with the Underwood ammo is a POI change. When sighted in with traditional ammo, neither my Diamondback nor my P365 will shoot the 68 grain Underwood Extreme Penetrators to POI. They impact at 7 oclock about three inches from the center of the target. This may have something to do with the short barrels.


    I won't presume this one .

    Did you mean * three inches low , at 7 yards * or * impacting three inches low and slightly left , at unspecified distance * ?

    But yes POI/ POA is something to be aware .

    Yes , generally with regular handguns , at " typical handgun distances " , light or fast , and particularly light and fast bullets will POI lower than standard for caliber weight bullets at more or less standard velocities. I varies from person to person , and gun to gun how much.

    And everyone must answer the Paul Harrell Rhetorical Question;, " Is it enough difference, to make a difference? " .


    What's the Intended Purpose, and what's your expectation ?

    I'm outspoken in my druthers , but we can safety say that for large % of people 3 inches low at 7 yards , with subcompact pistol , that they only forsee using at 7 yards or less , would dismiss 3 inch shift as trivial ( if they bothered to check ) . And it would usually work out for them.

    I have seen 6 to 12 inch offset at that distance, and I moved on with prejudice to other choices .
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,603
    Messages
    7,288,053
    Members
    33,487
    Latest member
    Mikeymike88

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom