HPRB June 7, 2016 Meeting Thread

[dblas]

I have a prior meeting, so I won't make this one.

 

[iCoder80]

Have any of you read the new policy rules posted on the HPRB web site? I found it to be interesting reading.

 

[Mr. Ed]

Looks like it'll be cookies tonight. See you folks there.

 

[jc1240]

I have JHU Shirts!

You know who you are!

They'd be good to wear at a Daniel Webster conference.

 

[Schipperke]

Board’s Action Requirements
Within 90 days after receiving a request for a review/hearing of the Secretary’s (of the State Police) action, the Board, at its discretion, may choose either to:

1) Review the record developed by the Secretary of the State Police; or
2) Conduct a hearing.

Decisions of the Board are not final until a written signed decision is sent to the applicant or holder of the permit

 

[basscat]

So now they can decide not to give you a hearing at all. I wouldn't call this progress.

 

[Schipperke]

So now they can decide not to give you a hearing at all. I wouldn't call this progress.

Exactly how DC appeals board works. It makes sense, unless you submit compelling argument that needs heard. Look at how many slam dunk prohibited persons file with HPRB. Waste of time for a hearing, if the facts are not in dispute.

 

[Jaybeez]

Just waiting for the live stream

 

[iCoder80]

Board’s Action Requirements
Within 90 days after receiving a request for a review/hearing of the Secretary’s (of the State Police) action, the Board, at its discretion, may choose either to:

1) Review the record developed by the Secretary of the State Police; or
2) Conduct a hearing.

Decisions of the Board are not final until a written signed decision is sent to the applicant or holder of the permit

I like the last paragraph best.

"The receipt of a decision letter is NOT the granting of a permit. Permits are issued by the MD State Police only, and unless an action for judicial review is initiated by either party, a permit shall be issued in due course from the MD State Police, when deemed appropriate."

When deemed appropriate is pretty open ended.

 

[basscat]

How many days/weeks/months = due course and when deemed appropriate ?

 

[Gryphon]

So now they can decide not to give you a hearing at all. I wouldn't call this progress.

That's not a change its in the statute. The current Board has committed to give hearing to anyone that requests it

 

[markgrutz]

Live stream is up and running...

http://50.97.94.44:2199/start/mgrutzma

Winamp, iTunes http://50.97.94.44:2199/tunein/mgrutzma.pls
Windows Media http://50.97.94.44:2199/tunein/mgrutzma.asx
Real Player http://50.97.94.44:2199/tunein/mgrutzma.ram
QuickTime http://50.97.94.44:2199/tunein/mgrutzma.qtl
Web Proxy http://50.97.94.44/stream/mgrutzma.pls

Mark

 

[Jaybeez]

Live stream is up and running...

http://50.97.94.44:2199/start/mgrutzma


Mark

Thanks!

 

[rrankin]

Thanks Mark

 

[W2D]

Harris and Neverdon going over the sign in sheets.

 

[Stoveman]

White just showed up, any chances this guy had have gone out the window.....

 

[protegeV]

White just showed up, any chances this guy had have gone out the window.....

Womp, womp, waaaaaaaaah...

 

[Applehd]

Blah...blah... blah... Criminal history... DENIED!
Its all falling on deaf ears.

 

[W2D]

This is why you should have a lawyer.

 

[gre24ene]

This guy has about as much of a chance as Bernie