RepublicOfFranklin
Ultimate Member
How did you come to this conclusion?
Although the other replies sum up my feelings pretty well, I’ll add on.
A first time offender getting to walk as a prohibited person doesn’t make this law fair. It’s a draconian measure that only restricts people who obey the law in the first place.
UBC’s won’t prevent any crime. Hardened criminals in and around Baltimore are what keeps this state’s crime rates high. Those people are already prohibited yet that doesn’t stop them from acquiring arms. The govt doesn’t do anything to slow them down, instead we lighten sentences across the board or drop gun charges entirely.
I’ve been held up before, by 2 dudes with rap sheets going back a decade with multiple arrests for armed robbery where the gun charges were dropped and they did less then half a year in the joint before doing it all again. This happened before the big “systematic blah blah let’s lower sentences” craze.
Guys like that aren’t stopped by UBC’s, they don’t fear jail and “fear of jail” is the only thing that gives law or government any authority. This law, like most laws, only serves to restrict the already law abiding even more while the MGA lets the criminal element run wild.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk