Fat Larry is too busy acting like a big shot nationally and smearing Trump locally to veto the bills. The coward will just let them become law in three weeks.
I was so gung-ho for LCL back in his first campaign. He sure fooled me. I am absolutely disappointed in him.
You and others are right. The coward will let them become law by ignoring them. He certainly could take a few minutes to veto key bills that go against constitutional rights, but he's too busy campaigning for '24.
I was so gung-ho for LCL back in his first campaign. He sure fooled me. I am absolutely disappointed in him.
You and others are right. The coward will let them become law by ignoring them. He certainly could take a few minutes to veto key bills that go against constitutional rights, but he's too busy campaigning for '24.
Right there with ya.
yup, he fooled a lot of us, homie
I'll delete if we don't want this on the public forum... But I just reread the bill and realized, this won't prevent us from private selling each other stripped, unused lower receivers right? Because I thought stripped lower receivers are just "firearms" (since they haven't become a pistol or a rifle yet); they aren't "rifles" or "shotguns".
Might be fuzzy enough to require a court test. Are you volunteering to be the test case?
I'll delete or move my post if we don't want this on the public forum... But I just reread the bill and realized, this won't prevent us from private selling each other stripped, unused lower receivers right? Because I thought stripped lower receivers are just "firearms" (since they haven't become a pistol or a rifle yet); they aren't "rifles" or "shotguns".
After reading the US code, I don't think it's fuzzy at a federal level. That said though, I don't know what nonsense is written into HB0004.
18 U.S. Code § 921
(7) The term “rifle” means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and made or remade to use the energy of an explosive to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for each single pull of the trigger.
A stripped lower isn't a rifle under the definition of "rifle" in US code. You can't shoulder it in a meaningful way. You can't fire it or even show an intent to fire it. You don't have a rifled bore (or any bore). You have no trigger.
A stripped lower receiver in MD is a regulated firearm and requires a 77r.
So.... NO!
A stripped lower receiver in MD is a regulated firearm and requires a 77r.
So.... NO!
Exactly, that's what I'm getting at. As long as it's not chambered in 223/556, stripped lowers should still be safe... Wonder if we should get the word out or not.
Only 223/556. Other chamber-ings are cash and carry.
I was so gung-ho for LCL back in his first campaign. He sure fooled me. I am absolutely disappointed in him.
You and others are right. The coward will let them become law by ignoring them. He certainly could take a few minutes to veto key bills that go against constitutional rights, but he's too busy campaigning for '24.
A stripped lower receiver in MD is a regulated firearm and requires a 77r.
So.... NO!
Only AR-15, right?
I know AR-10 lowers are cash and carry
Only 223/556. Other chamber-ings are cash and carry.