If you are flat on your back, with someone on top, beating and banging your head on the concrete, just where would you be able to retreat to?
Call up Scotty to beam you back to the enterprise.
If you are flat on your back, with someone on top, beating and banging your head on the concrete, just where would you be able to retreat to?
-Tom Petty
"Gonna stand my ground, won't be turned around
And I'll keep this world from draggin' me down
Gonna stand my ground and I won't back down
Well I know what's right, I got just one life
In a world that keeps on pushin' me around
But I'll stand my ground and I won't back down
I will stand my ground
And I won't back down"
-Tom Petty
Clearly a racist song.
Guess that would apply to the Castle Doctrine too?? I suppose that your first order of business during a home invasion should be to find the nearest window (2nd or 3rd story, notwithstanding) and jump out of it like a startled deer.
More proof that the current crop of politicians don't want citizens... they want sheeple.
Let me help you brush up on your elementary grammar and save you from future humiliation. A comment is a remark expressing an opinion. Comments end with periods. A question is a sentence worded to elicit information. Questions end with question marks. I asked a question for clarification. You made a comment that was absolutely useless.Read the law before you comment, it will save you some humiliation.
Florida statute 776.012 states that you can use force when a person reasonably believe there is an "imminent use of unlawful force." According to this, you don't have to already be in a violent altercation. You just have to reasonably believe that someone is about to assault you and cause you great bodily harm. As such, did TM have the justification to stand his ground? If someone was chasing you, would you stand your ground?He wasn't in a violent altercation until he allegedly started it.
Let me help you brush up on your elementary grammar and save you from future humiliation. A comment is a remark expressing an opinion. Comments end with periods. A question is a sentence worded to elicit information. Questions end with question marks. I asked a question for clarification. You made a comment that was absolutely useless.
Florida statute 776.012 states that you can use force when a person reasonably believe there is an "imminent use of unlawful force." According to this, you don't have to already be in a violent altercation. You just have to reasonably believe that someone is about to assault you and cause you great bodily harm. As such, did TM have the justification to stand his ground? If someone was chasing you, would you stand your ground?
Yes, but that's not specifically part of SYG. It's a general self-defense provision.Does FL SYG have a "civil immunity" provision?
Both? Not bloody likely. Martin escaped Zimmerman's view and was at his house. Rather than enter the safety of his house, he doubled back to confront (the most applicable word I can think of) Zimmerman. That's not what somebody in fear for their life does, that's what somebody looking to get even does.It's possible TM acted within the law as did George Zimmerman. They both could have feared for their lives, thus they'd both be cleared of charges.
Florida statute 776.012 states that you can use force when a person reasonably believe there is an "imminent use of unlawful force." According to this, you don't have to already be in a violent altercation. You just have to reasonably believe that someone is about to assault you and cause you great bodily harm. As such, did TM have the justification to stand his ground? If someone was chasing you, would you stand your ground?
Republican Governor Rick Scott said he met with leaders of the sit-in demonstration for the first time on Thursday night, but he indicated he had no plans to call a special session.
Durbin also plans toexaminegut the legal definition of self defense, how the laws have affected shooting confrontations and how the laws interact with racial profiling bylaw enforcementrace-baiters.
From Bloomberg’s perspective such laws, “…can inspire dangerous vigilantism and protect those who act recklessly with guns,” adding that they, “…encourage deadly confrontations by enabling people to shoot first and argue ‘justifiable homicide’ later.”
Got that? Apparently, the Mayor of New York City believes that the bad guy in the assault equation is the lawful gun owner.
That doesn’t sound fair. Why, they ought to pass a law that protects a citizen’s right to defend themselves without fear of prosecution for having done so. Oh, wait! There are such laws. They’re called Stand Your Ground laws.
... Stand Your Ground concept, or “No duty to retreat,” and closely associated laws known as The Castle Doctrine (which applies to the protection of your life and property when at home), is not a new idea. In 1921, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. declared in Brown v. United States (256 U.S. 335, 343 (16 May 1921)), a case upholding the “No duty to retreat” maxim, Justice Holmes said that, “Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife.” {or a fist while straddled over someone's chest for that matter}
Sound Familiar ??? Progressives ... attempting to turn citizens back into sheeple since 1921 by appealing to the {lack of} intellect of low-information voters.... is the realization that those attempting to repeal SYG laws simply don’t want civilians to have guns in their hands. Thus, if you can be made to believe that you might be liable for prosecution for murder should you ever have to defend yourself with a firearm, then maybe you’ll come to believe that carrying a gun simply isn’t worth the risk. And that’s part of the whole overall anti-gun strategy: to make it too expensive, too onerous, too bureaucratic, and too risky to have a gun. Ergo, if you can’t ban ‘em, just make ‘em not worth the trouble.
The only thing more annoying about eric withholder besides him looking like Speedy Gonzales is his mousy sounding voice. When he talks his voice is more annoying than hussein's voice as he whistles along when he runs his pie hole. Oh eric withholders new nickname because of Fast and Furious. Speedy "Gun"zales.
Or should we just follow the Holder Theory of Conflict Resolution, that a citizen out and about in public, when confronted with the immediate threat of death or significant bodily harm, has a duty to attempt to retreat ?Reviewing American state law, the constitutional lawyer Eugene Volokh did a quick headcount this week and revealed that:
The substantial majority view among the states, by a 31-19 margin, is no duty to retreat. Florida is thus part of this substantial majority on this point. And most of these states took this view even before the recent spate of “stand your ground” statutes, including the Florida statute.
Why does it make things tougher for prosecutors? If they can't prosecute because an SYG law precludes that, that means less work they hafta do. That way they can go back to the coffee shop to enjoy another lot-tay or play another round of golf on our dime much like the community agitator-in-chief.I actually heard one of the FL prosecutors say that SYG was bad law because it makes things tougher for prosecutors. Well, duh . . .
Following the verdict, (CBC) argued forcefully that, decades after the civil rights movement, the nation’s criminal justice system still discriminates against blacks
Clearly a racist song.