alucard0822
For great Justice
I am absolutely fine with no drones near airports. If a bird strike can bring down an airliner, a drone certainly can. Remember your average person is borderline retarded. Im sure ill be called unamerican and someone will say "apply your logic to guns". There is a difference. Can you find it?
Obviously people should not fly any RC aircraft where it could interfere with or strike a manned aircraft, and there are no cases where it has happened. Without permission nobody can fly on airport grounds, and current regs including the AMA safety code have a 400' ceiling within 3 miles of an active airport without permission. Many GPS capable aircraft are locked out from the factory within the 3mi circle around large airports, or will limit altitude. It's reasonable to detect and counter airport incursions aggainst existing laws and there are existing penalties to enforce them.
The problem is that the FAA and other agencies power trip keep trying to redefine this in a way to basically write their own law. They have tried expanding the radius, applying it as a no-fly instead of 400' ceiling, and applying it to every farm field landing strip and inactive airport in the country, which de-facto bans flight most everywhere around here. Not unlike the GFSZA banning firearms within 1,000 feet of any school, with unchallenged regulation resulting in a broad interpretation it could ban firearm possession for millions of people near, but not on school grounds. Now expand the radius to a few miles, redefine a "school" as any home daycare or vocational training buisness, and you can see how a "common sense" law gets abused to create a ban through regulation never intended to apply to that law. That is basically what is going on with RC aircraft AKA "drones"