RoadDawg
Nos nostraque Deo
- Dec 6, 2010
- 94,483
Pretty sure there are other things that were accepted by the military 100+ years ago that have gotten better/changed with time.
One size doesn't have to fit all. Pretty sure .223 didn't exist 100 years ago, so I guess we should be prejudiced against military rifles in that caliber too
Who's prejudice? I have no issues with 1911 STYLE pistols in other calibers. But a 1911 was not the name of the design. It was a military designation that identifies a pistol which was used by the US Military for many years and many wars. None of them were 9MM.
The military version of the AR15 was first designated the "M16" should we call all of them M16s?