The anti 2A group does it all the time, in uniform. Did you see the crowd behind DiFi at her news conference the other day?
Has anyone been able to garner the support of local, county, or state law enforcement? I have written letters to county sheriffs that may be on our side but so far have not gotten any responses. I know that 127 local sheriffs, nationwide, have vowed not to enforce any gun control laws on the national level, but what about here in Maryland?
Nuremberg Prosecutor: "Why did you kill all those people?"This might sound strange, but honestly I dont WANT law enforcement officers picking which laws they want to enforce. Ignoring something thats not blatant (the same as they would a burned out taillight) is one thing, but flat out refusing to enforce laws that are legally sound and have gone through our established system (though stupid and potentially constitutionally unjust) scares me. THAT is something we see in third world, police-controlled societies. I want the laws changed, not selectively enforced. If they want to threaten to quit or complain with the backing of their badge, great.
Spoke to a MSP sergeant the other day. He seemed much more worried about the .410 Taurus Judge than an "assault weapon". Says it is too easy for folks to hide and then hit responding officers in the face and eyes with pellets.
His worry would be that gun manufacturers, in response to an AWB, would then try to make guns more lethal within the confines of the ban and come up with more and deadlier close range weapons.
If police officers won't speak out against legislation before it is law, what makes anyone here think they'll refuse to enforce it when it is?
So, an LEO (of any position) who had built their family and life around is supposed to speak out against something that is not a law yet and roll the dice if they will have a career the next day?
people are very valiant and cavalier with someone elses life.
Why don't people wait and see what will be law first before commenting about when others should speak out?
Sent from my phone from somewhere in the world.
So if they are fearful for their Gov't job if they speak out about the constitutionality of a proposed law, then what makes you think they won't have the same fear after it is passed. Would they not have the same recourse in securing their job before and after.
They don't seem to have any fear of speaking out about issues before and after when it comes to their job benefits and union negotiating rights. No problem exercising their first amendment rights when it comes to their job.
reacting to a proposal is different than reacting to an actual law and what you could be ordered to do according to that law. But you aren't in that position to lose your livelyhood if you speak out right now are you? Just because something may go"unsaid" does not mean it will go undone according to their feelings. Someone with 20 years as an leo cannot just go to work for a car dealership or computer job where you work and pick up from where they left off.
Sent from my phone from somewhere in the world.
My honest opinion is that when laws are being purposed within a state that are supposed to address any sort of crime or crime prevention, the voices of LE should be heard and their experienced and professional opinions should be held with the highest regard. Most of them would probably not prioritize an AWB, but would rather the state allocate additional funds needed to procure additional staff and resources needed to do their jobs more effectively and enforce the laws currently on the books.
If the law makers really cared, they would invite all areas of law enforcement enforcement for their input. They couldn't care less what me, you and agencies have to say. You know that.
Sent from my phone from somewhere in the world.
I got a very good email from Carroll County Sheriff Tregoning.
He is definitely a patriot.
My honest opinion is that when laws are being purposed within a state that are supposed to address any sort of crime or crime prevention, the voices of LE should be heard and their experienced and professional opinions should be held with the highest regard. Most of them would probably not prioritize an AWB, but would rather the state allocate additional funds needed to procure additional staff and resources needed to do their jobs more effectively and enforce the laws currently on the books.
I will be there on the 6th. I am a Leo and I openly oppose any form of an AWB as we all know it will do nothing to prevent violent crime. As far as what we would or would not do if the proposed AWB passes, this is not really the time or place to disscuss that.
Has anyone been able to garner the support of local, county, or state law enforcement? I have written letters to county sheriffs that may be on our side but so far have not gotten any responses. I know that 127 local sheriffs, nationwide, have vowed not to enforce any gun control laws on the national level, but what about here in Maryland?