Budget AR

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • bkuether

    Judge not this race .....
    Jan 18, 2012
    6,212
    Marriottsville, MD
    It depends what you want to do now.

    Since you are asking about price we have to assume you are on a budget.

    Windham - You get a very nice rifle, plus the carry handle sight, and a case. You have LOTS of money to buy magazines and ammo.

    Colt - Probably a better overall rifle. You may have to get a rear sight. You will also have to buy a case to take it to the range. You have less money for ammo and magazines.

    I see the Windham as the get out and start shooting NOW rifle. The Colt is your wait for more funds to buy things you need, and shoot it later.

    Of course if money isn't the object, just buy the Colt. :rolleyes:
     

    silver78

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 18, 2009
    2,324
    I don't have any evidence to back up my opinion. But for me I have learned that the "budget" choice is no bargain in the long run. I have bought and sold several ARs over the years.

    Personally I wouldn't buy either of the brands mentioned by the OP.

    Colt = Large pin traitors
    WW = just don't know enough about them

    Here are the manufacturers of the ARs that I currently own and have been satisfied with:

    National Manufacturers:

    Armalite
    Rock River
    Stag

    Smaller Shops:

    White Oak
    Engage

    I I was looking for an AR today and price was a concern I would make two phone calls

    1 Engage in Rockville
    2 Pete in NH - RR & Stag Dealer (ar15sales.com)

    I have bought from both of them. Give them your budget and let them make suggestions. Good luck whatever you decide to do.
     

    bkuether

    Judge not this race .....
    Jan 18, 2012
    6,212
    Marriottsville, MD
    I don't have any evidence to back up my opinion. But for me I have learned that the "budget" choice is no bargain in the long run. I have bought and sold several ARs over the years.

    Personally I wouldn't buy either of the brands mentioned by the OP.

    Colt = Large pin traitors
    WW = just don't know enough about them

    Here are the manufacturers of the ARs that I currently own and have been satisfied with:

    National Manufacturers:

    Armalite
    Rock River
    Stag

    Smaller Shops:

    White Oak
    Engage

    I I was looking for an AR today and price was a concern I would make two phone calls

    1 Engage in Rockville
    2 Pete in NH - RR & Stag Dealer (ar15sales.com)

    I have bought from both of them. Give them your budget and let them make suggestions. Good luck whatever you decide to do.

    Second on the Stag, great overall rifle. I have a RR Arms upper, and the thing is well built and is a tack driver when "I" am on..... ;)
     

    inkd

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 4, 2009
    7,543
    Ridge
    I don't have any evidence to back up my opinion. But for me I have learned that the "budget" choice is no bargain in the long run. I have bought and sold several ARs over the years.

    Personally I wouldn't buy either of the brands mentioned by the OP.

    Colt = Large pin traitors
    WW = just don't know enough about them

    When Freedom Group bought out Bushmaster, they moved all production from Windham, Maine to New York, all the workers stayed in Maine though.

    The old owner still owned the property where Bushmaster formerly was and after his no-compete clause expired, he got back into the rifle business and hired all of the former workers back and named the new company Windham Weaponry.

    They may be new in name but they have been building rifles for quite a long time.

    Personally, I wouldn't own a Colt if someone gave it to me. I have an admitted personal bias towards them though, nothing against the quality of their AR's. Just their company policy.
     

    bobbo

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 21, 2011
    51
    .223 Wilde it fits .223 and 5.56 bullets
    Anderson upper and lower mag pull furniture
    Your looking at about 450 if you shop around
     

    travistheone

    Usual Suspect
    Dec 11, 2008
    5,600
    cockeysville
    Any facts to back this up?



    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

    Supplying facts for the benefit of the OP.

    MPI/HPT tested and certified 4150 bolt vs. batch test.

    F sight base vs A2

    guaranteed to be staked correctly vs varied history

    Should be an H buffer vs carbine buffer

    and the list goes on...

    confirmation bias towards a brand you own doesn't help anything/anyone.

    for the record I own neither.
     

    Mike444

    About to be a CZ guy
    Dec 30, 2012
    61
    Parkton
    Supplying facts for the benefit of the OP.



    MPI/HPT tested and certified 4150 bolt vs. batch test.



    F sight base vs A2



    guaranteed to be staked correctly vs varied history



    Should be an H buffer vs carbine buffer



    and the list goes on...



    confirmation bias towards a brand you own doesn't help anything/anyone.



    for the record I own neither.



    Thank you.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     

    bobbo

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 21, 2011
    51
    I have read that individually HPT and MPI test bolts and carriers should be marked as such, yet there is no mention of this in any of the military standards.

    First, I do not believe that there is any reason to HPT/MPI a carrier.

    Second, Mil-C-70599A DOES call for marking of bolts and barrels that have passed the tests


    4.7.4.4 Proof Markings. Proof marks and magnetic particle
    inspection marks shall be applied on barrel assemblies and bolts that have passed this test.
     

    bobbo

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 21, 2011
    51
    Just because something is stated as being 'mil-spec,' doesn't necessarily mean it adheres to the exact military specification for that item. And even though a manufacturer states it's product has been HPT and/or MPT, it doesn't necessarily mean that those proceedures were carried out in accordance with a military standard.

    I understand what the military specifications are and why they are in place. I also feel the term 'mil-spec' is used quite loosely in the consumer market. 'Mil-spec' in that the bolt has been properly manufacturer, tested, but mysteriously not marked? Or 'mil-spec' in that it was made to a standard dimension and will work with 'any mil-spec' carrier?
     

    Trepang

    Ultimate Member
    Dec 10, 2015
    3,352
    Southern Illinois
    FWIW my Rock River had very weak staking on the gas key and none on the castle nut - Chad fixed that for me. While he was doing that, he pointed out that the M4 style feed ramps were put in with a dremel tool after the fact He used a Colt 6721 to show the way Colts feed ramps were milled in during the manufacturing process.

    If you are looking for opinions, I'd go with a Colt. My first was a Rock River and the second two have been Colts. I have not had any issues with the RRA but then again I don't really shoot it that much.
     

    Mike444

    About to be a CZ guy
    Dec 30, 2012
    61
    Parkton
    FWIW my Rock River had very weak staking on the gas key and none on the castle nut - Chad fixed that for me. While he was doing that, he pointed out that the M4 style feed ramps were put in with a dremel tool after the fact He used a Colt 6721 to show the way Colts feed ramps were milled in during the manufacturing process.

    If you are looking for opinions, I'd go with a Colt. My first was a Rock River and the second two have been Colts. I have not had any issues with the RRA but then again I don't really shoot it that much.



    Valuable feedback. Thank you


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
     

    bobbo

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 21, 2011
    51
    HPT is a mixed bag with dubious benefits. It's a destructive test that dramatically shortens the service life of a bolt. This is a non-issue for the military which specs a 3K round service life for the M4A1 bolts. In practical use, the machine gun rental range we contract to beat on prospective parts confirms that the functional life of non-HPT bolts far exceeds those of HPT bolts. HPT isn't even that good of an indicator that a bolt was made correctly. In Jan. 2013, a manufacturer released a batch of incorrectly treated bolts which were individually HPTed and MPIed. The bolts didn't start failing until consumers ran them. Every one of them would fail within the first magazine of use but HPT didn't catch this.
     

    inkd

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 4, 2009
    7,543
    Ridge
    FWIW my Rock River had very weak staking on the gas key and none on the castle nut - Chad fixed that for me. While he was doing that, he pointed out that the M4 style feed ramps were put in with a dremel tool after the fact He used a Colt 6721 to show the way Colts feed ramps were milled in during the manufacturing process.

    If you are looking for opinions, I'd go with a Colt. My first was a Rock River and the second two have been Colts. I have not had any issues with the RRA but then again I don't really shoot it that much.

    In Chad's armorer class that I took, 2 Noveske BCG's failed the staking test. One of them was mine.

    I turned 2 people onto WW rifles and gave them a look over based on what I learned from Chad. Both of them passed the staking test.

    Go figure.
     

    travistheone

    Usual Suspect
    Dec 11, 2008
    5,600
    cockeysville
    HPT is a mixed bag with dubious benefits. It's a destructive test that dramatically shortens the service life of a bolt. This is a non-issue for the military which specs a 3K round service life for the M4A1 bolts. In practical use, the machine gun rental range we contract to beat on prospective parts confirms that the functional life of non-HPT bolts far exceeds those of HPT bolts. HPT isn't even that good of an indicator that a bolt was made correctly. In Jan. 2013, a manufacturer released a batch of incorrectly treated bolts which were individually HPTed and MPIed. The bolts didn't start failing until consumers ran them. Every one of them would fail within the first magazine of use but HPT didn't catch this.

    what manufacturer do you work for?

    last time I checked you were looking for part time work.

    2/3s of your posts here have been to stir the pot in various threads. If you are such an expert on ARs and medical supplies create a thread sharing the knowledge, or a thread selling the knowledge.
     

    bobbo

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Oct 21, 2011
    51
    Iam retired out of the military. I consult and train for a government contractor. I'm not an ar16 expert maybe a m4,249,and 240 expert. That info came from the Cw4 next to me regarding ar15s
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,587
    Messages
    7,287,609
    Members
    33,482
    Latest member
    Claude

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom