No no no just the woods that I own.Yes yes yes the woods behind your house are also verboten we know
I don’t have to ask permission how to manage them like you need to permission to be a spokesperson for someone else for how to think or do.
No no no just the woods that I own.Yes yes yes the woods behind your house are also verboten we know
Yes, you can ban guns from your property but it's unconstitutional for the government to do it for you. You open that door and yes the same people who gave us SB1, the government, will take the next step and ban even property owners from possessing guns on their own property. Why? Because a property owner can also be a dumbass with a gun and they're the government so they know what's best for everyone.I don’t want or need somebody in my house that I don’t know with a gun on them.
If they don’t like it they go somewhere else and work.
Now that I think about it, I don’t want anybody in or around my house that I don’t know or for whom I’m not familiar with anyhow.
I don’t fall into the train of thought either,well they are law abiding have a permit yada yada.
Permit issued by who?
BFD. The same people who gave you SB1?which coincidentally hPpens to be the same authority that wants to tell a person who can do what and where with a firearm.
Since when does having a permit or good conceal method prohibit someone from being a dumbass with some iron in my house?
Yeah right.
I’ll be giving the permits at my place thank you very much.
Others may want to pull some role reversal BS like anti 2A Uncle Tom for sB1 etc.
that’s horse shit pot meet kettle bs too.
Sorry to disappoint any constitutionalist here. You can let ‘em in all you want at your place.
I have a friend in that position, he wife has a licensed day care at their home. She teaches the younger ones ( 3-4 yo ) to their ABCs and if they can some reading. Yes 4 yo can learn to start reading. SB1 says pre kindergarden facilities. Depending what Comar winds up saying he maybe screwed.You open that door and yes the same people who gave us SB1, the government, will take the next step and ban even property owners from possessing guns on their own property.
Of note, most of those insurance/membership arrangements also cover you when you use OTHER forms of self defense. And if you have to use your firearm in your home. You might have a no-chance-of-charges incident at home, but still get sued by the dead perp's mom because an ambulance chaser told her she could at least get the comfort of a bunch of money he was too dead to steal personally.Guess those with carry 'insurance' can probably drop it come October 1 since you'll have limited carry ability.
Remember that most of these policies won't cover your legal expenses if you were doing something illegal when whatever happened happened. Illegal, like carrying where you're not allowed to, for instance. So if you get busted in a no-carry zone, it's entirely on you.Or you'll need to keep it for when you get busted carrying in a restricted zone you didn't know existed.
Home daycare providers are exemptedI have a friend in that position, he wife has a licensed day care at their home. She teaches the younger ones ( 3-4 yo ) to their ABCs and if they can some reading. Yes 4 yo can learn to start reading. SB1 says pre kindergarden facilities. Depending what Comar winds up saying he maybe screwed.
just like New york that wont let pastors who live on church property have a gun at home ( yes I know that was stayed and unstayed I dont remember where its at now )
Carry insurance doesn't cover legal costs of you breaking the law carrying where you shouldn't. Carry insurance is for self defense shootings.Guess those with carry 'insurance' can probably drop it come October 1 since you'll have limited carry ability. Or you'll need to keep it for when you get busted carrying in a restricted zone you didn't know existed.
Motion for a PI filed. Attached.
As written now, but what about when Comar is done.Home daycare providers are exempted
Nice! Well done.Motion for a PI filed. Attached.
It’s specific, it’s not vague, they can add they can clarify, but they cannot contradict what is specifically written in the actAs written now, but what about when Comar is done.
x2Give ‘em hell. Thank you Mark & MSI
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
May God bless us!!!Motion for a PI filed. Attached.
Thank you!!!Motion for a PI filed. Attached.
Thanks Mark. I had to tap out at page 22, my brain just isn't wired to follow/comprehend legalese. Glad you're in charge of it.Motion for a PI filed. Attached.
I don’t want or need somebody in my house that I don’t know with a gun on them.
If they don’t like it they go somewhere else and work.
Now that I think about it, I don’t want anybody in or around my house that I don’t know or for whom I’m not familiar with anyhow.
I don’t fall into the train of thought either,well they are law abiding have a permit yada yada.
Permit issued by who?
BFD. The same people who gave you SB1?which coincidentally hPpens to be the same authority that wants to tell a person who can do what and where with a firearm.
Since when does having a permit or good conceal method prohibit someone from being a dumbass with some iron in my house?
Yeah right.
I’ll be giving the permits at my place thank you very much.
Others may want to pull some role reversal BS like anti 2A Uncle Tom for sB1 etc.
that’s horse shit pot meet kettle bs too.
Sorry to disappoint any constitutionalist here. You can let ‘em in all you want at your place.