Extreme Force Lubricant from AWT LLC

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Mr. Ed

    This IS my Happy Face
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 8, 2009
    7,920
    Edgewater
    :gun1::gun1:Well as for me and my firearms I'll stick with what Clandestine recommended

    Me, too. On one hand, we have Chad, who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of AR excellence, and probably knows more than anybody else we've heard from on the matter. Many of us use his methods and AFAIK NONE of us have experienced anything except good results. Not to say that his way is the only way, but it makes sense and it works. I will admit that at first it was an uphill battle to use that much lube. Can't argue with the results, though. It just works! :party29:

    On the other hand there are lots of cleaners/lubricants/preservatives offering a spectrum of results. Most will probably work well enough if used appropriately. Somebody mentioned Hoppes... I bet most of us older guys started out with that and had (what we thought were) good results.

    It's amazing that we continually dig this old horse out of its grave, beat it some more just to be sure it's good and dead, and in some cases jump on the OP for merely posting info and/or asking a question. How about we all just use what we like and move on?

    The smell brings back lots of great memories, though...
     

    Attachments

    • hoppes.jpg
      hoppes.jpg
      18.8 KB · Views: 177

    DaemonAssassin

    Why should we Free BSD?
    Jun 14, 2012
    24,000
    Political refugee in WV
    Me, too. On one hand, we have Chad, who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of AR excellence, and probably knows more than anybody else we've heard from on the matter. Many of us use his methods and AFAIK NONE of us have experienced anything except good results. Not to say that his way is the only way, but it makes sense and it works. I will admit that at first it was an uphill battle to use that much lube. Can't argue with the results, though. It just works! :party29:

    On the other hand there are lots of cleaners/lubricants/preservatives offering a spectrum of results. Most will probably work well enough if used appropriately. Somebody mentioned Hoppes... I bet most of us older guys started out with that and had (what we thought were) good results.

    It's amazing that we continually dig this old horse out of its grave, beat it some more just to be sure it's good and dead, and in some cases jump on the OP for merely posting info and/or asking a question. How about we all just use what we like and move on?

    The smell brings back lots of great memories, though...

    The OP for this thread is long gone. Ban hammered...
     

    rob-cubed

    In need of moderation
    Sep 24, 2009
    5,387
    Holding the line in Baltimore
    Since this thread has long lost its signal to noise ratio, from Ballistol's product sheet:

    Ballistol contains medicinal grade mineral oil, alkaline salts of oleic acid, several alcohols, Benzyl Acetate and an oil from vegetal seeds. The mineral oil is unchlorinated and conforms to the specifications of US Pharmacopeia XX.


    In experiments with rats and rabbits the animals' entire intestinal tract and stomachs were filled with Ballistol. The animals showed signs of uneasiness. After the Ballistol had been evacuated from their bodies as provided for by nature, the animals without exception appeared to be in excellent condition and showed no adverse prolonged side effects. It was not possible to establish an LD 50.

    Ballistol does not contain ingredients considered hazardous by OSHA. It does not contain any ingredients, which normally may be considered harmful or fatal if swallowed. It does not contain any ingredients which may be toxic for warm-blooded organisms, reptiles or aquatic organisms, if used as directed.

    Ballistol does not contain any ingredients known to cause cancer such as 1,1,1 Trichloroethane, 1.1,2,2 Tetrachloroethylene, tar, Teflon (Polytetrafluorethylene) or Silicone. Ballistol does not contain chlorine or chlorinated substances. Ballistol aerosols do not contain CFCs. The Isohexane contained in Ballistol aerosols as a thinner containes less than 3% n-Hexane, which make it non-toxic.

    I love Ballistol. I bet it would season my cast iron pans to nearly non-stick. Should I experiment (for science)?
     

    K-43

    West of Morning Side
    Oct 20, 2010
    1,882
    PG
    Anise smells and tastes good, but Licorice is more better. Opinion humbly submitted.
     

    Gambler

    ¿Got Freedom?
    Oct 30, 2011
    3,476
    Parkville
    I just saw this thread title, and who it was started by, and I said, "OH I HAVE TO SEE THIS!" It was well worth it. Turns out I missed some good ban hammer action in the Trump thread too!
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,644
    Messages
    7,289,630
    Members
    33,493
    Latest member
    dracula

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom