SCARCQB
Get Opp my rawn, Plick!
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Leupold-Mark-6-1-6x20mm-M6C1-Front-Focal-Riflescope/21708671
walmart scope for your Tavor.
walmart scope for your Tavor.
But yet even with his budget, he couldn't get his convertible with the turbo motor.
Just having fun SCAR.
Wouldn't mind picking up a lefty for myself, but life and finances prevent that at the moment.
It seems like im giving out honest information and people get pissed about the truth.
Its a new platform.. There are quirks to improve upon . American ingenuity and a free market will come up with solutions. as an engineer, i always say.. We cant fix the problems that we dont know about.
For the record,The Tavor... Is better than its counterparts.. Like the AUG, FS2000, CQZ97, FAMAS, Valmet71, N86S,L85, RFB, VHS, SKI SAR, SA Vector. ETC. But it is far from being perfect. Expensive also does not translate to perfection.
Given the choice of picking between the TAR or the AUG... I would pick the AUG..only because I am used to it and familiar with it strength and weakness. I am scrutinizing the Tavor... Because thats what I do. I fix things that are broke. one day, with enough knowledge and experience with this platform... I may consider it as my new HD gun. But it has not earned that title as of yet.
Whos getting pissed? Seems like we are having a serious discussion and relating our opinions about a new weapons system on the US market.
There is no need to mention names.
Without names, there can be no butthurt.
Without butthurt, no thread is entertaining.
Can't justify spending nearly as much for an optic as the rifle costs. Digging the recommendations, thanks. Buis shot great, again today no problem with them, even after laying the wpnsystm down hard several times on bench and tossing in/out of vehicles.
M21 is my lead contender, but I'm in no hurry and still looking.
The sling did make a big difference, like the convertible 2- or 1- point sling options.
So far every mag I've tried has worked flawlessly.
Reading more into the Tavor manual.
It recommends a 50 yard zero using the BUIS. That results in a 50/250 yard zero.
Just remember that it will shoot high at that setting. ( about 6.6" high at 100)
This is okay with combat shooting . Designed for COM or Center of mass hits. For range use. I would really suggest at 75 yard zero. That is a bit more accurate for target shooting. This also applies to red dots or reflex sights.
Pickin on the glockmobile..... Darn it. Lol... Thats what democrats do all the time.
It seems like im giving out honest information and people get pissed about the truth.
Its a new platform.. There are quirks to improve upon . American ingenuity and a free market will come up with solutions. as an engineer, i always say.. We cant fix the problems that we dont know about.
For the record,The Tavor... Is better than its counterparts.. Like the AUG, FS2000, CQZ97, FAMAS, Valmet71, N86S,L85, RFB, VHS, SKI SAR, SA Vector. ETC. But it is far from being perfect. Expensive also does not translate to perfection.
Given the choice of picking between the TAR or the AUG... I would pick the AUG..only because I am used to it and familiar with it strength and weakness. I am scrutinizing the Tavor... Because thats what I do. I fix things that are broke. one day, with enough knowledge and experience with this platform... I may consider it as my new HD gun. But it has not earned that title as of yet.
Well I can't pick fun on your choice of firearms or how you equip them, so the only thing left is the Glockmobile...
Normally the Democrat part would be a insult, but I am a DINO now.
Tavor in 7.62 would be nice
The Glockmobile will soon be.. My daughters car. The GLOCK34 tags will give way to 2QT4YOU........ At this point, it will cease to be the Glockmobile. Nor will i be man enough to drive it with the new tags.
Im looking for a 4door jeep wrangler..... With a pintle mount on the roof.
Brad is working on a lefty chambered in 300 blackout.