So after the election where do you think our 2A rights stand?

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Sthomas229

    none
    MDS Supporter
    May 7, 2009
    6,667
    Laurel, MD
    "Zero" getting shot down (politically, of course...) and crashing to his doom???

    No, that's where I think our 2A rights stand at this point.
    Either Obobo starts hitting us with executive orders or puts up a couple SC judges, either way, we'll be like UK or Austrailia within 5 years.:sad20:
     

    MDFF2008

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 12, 2008
    24,782
    Republican House means no change to the law. Administrative changes.....well......

    Yes

    What I worry about is the final 2 years. There will be an election in 2014. If the Dems pick up big during that election, we are in real danger.


    And that's how I expect it to go. Obama will try to get the House to appear out of touch and obstructionist in the hopes of them loosing the House.

    Then in his final 2 years, he can make the assault on gun rights full on.

    Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
     

    bbguns

    Defend the Constitution
    Jan 28, 2010
    450
    Heading to Free America
    BHO wants a new 'assault weapons' ban...he said it in 2008, kept quiet for a while, and said it again in the 2nd debate. No, the House won't pass it this session...but whenever he doesn't get his way, he issues an executive order circumventing the checks/balances that were placed in the Constitution (which may be on life support soon). He could fairly easily get a de facto ban by many means...import/export restrictions, 'fees', EPA regulations...and a few others that I'm sure some Brady folks have thought of...all of which create an effective ban without needing to pass a pesky law.
    I can't say for sure what he'll actually do but I am certain that our 2A rights are in much greater jeopardy now that he's got a second term...
     

    booker

    Active Member
    Apr 5, 2008
    776
    Baltimore
    I can't wait to come back to these threads in 3-4 years and list out all the claims people were so sure about that didn't materialize. I wish we had them from 12 years ago.
     

    damionkarp

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 9, 2012
    99
    Does the Navy Scuttle a ship when a Captain leaves or retires from the boat? No, they simply put a new Captain in place and throw on a fresh coat of paint. Just because Obama doesn't have to worry about re-election doesn't mean he will run the country into the ground. Voters would change parties if he does some outlandish things. If you step on the tail of a dog, some will yelp, others will turn and bite you.
     

    Knuckle66

    One of the 365
    Mar 11, 2012
    615
    Hagerstown
    Does the Navy Scuttle a ship when a Captain leaves or retires from the boat? No, they simply put a new Captain in place and throw on a fresh coat of paint. Just because Obama doesn't have to worry about re-election doesn't mean he will run the country into the ground. Voters would change parties if he does some outlandish things. If you step on the tail of a dog, some will yelp, others will turn and bite you.

    I don't believe Dems will ever leave his side. If he decided to run for a 3rd term they'd let him.
     

    damionkarp

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Aug 9, 2012
    99
    I don't believe Dems will ever leave his side. If he decided to run for a 3rd term they'd let him.

    I think he will push some envelopes and after his term will be the supporter of his predecessor like Bill Clinton was for him. Dems will have a strong grip and we will do what we can to break their grip.
     

    Speaker2Wolves

    Banned
    BANNED!!!
    Feb 27, 2012
    322
    Dear doom and gloom proponents:

    Lighten up will ya?

    Three things are evident to anyone who looks into the issue.

    The first is that politicians of both stripes, conservative and liberal, respond to their constituents first and foremost.

    The second is that there is a ground swell of individuals discovering how much fun firearms can be. Range memberships are up across the country, many states are shall issue, and gun ownership is no longer perceived to be exclusively the realm of the right-wing nut job, anti-government anarchist. Ammo prices are up because of higher demand, and it's not just because of prepper hoarding.

    The third is that a number of states have liberalized their carry laws. This means there is now legal and political precedent that make change in other states more likely.

    In other words, even if legal avenues in MD aren't successful, the more folks who learn to enjoy shooting, the more politicians will have to bow to those of their constituents who want reasonable gun laws. (And no, I don't mean full automatics for everyone, I mean reasonable as in allowing semi-auto weapons for hunting and sport, reasonable carry laws, etc.)

    So if you really want to help the cause, take a friend out to shoot who's never been. Preferably a liberal friend. (Oh, wait...)
     

    Knuckle66

    One of the 365
    Mar 11, 2012
    615
    Hagerstown
    He can't. It's illegal. He can't change that without a Constitutional amendment. He barely even got elected.

    He got 303 electoral votes, that's not barely getting elected that's a landslide. If he wins the house they could try to amend the constitution.

    I'm not saying that they would or even would try. I'm just using that a an anlogy that they won't leave him no matter what.
     

    RustyGunner

    Member
    Sep 12, 2012
    73
    He got 303 electoral votes, that's not barely getting elected that's a landslide. If he wins the house they could try to amend the constitution.

    I'm not saying that they would or even would try. I'm just using that a an anlogy that they won't leave him no matter what.

    That's electoral numbercrunching. Look at the margins in the swing states. Also look at the rules for amendments. It's a great deal more involved than simply passing legislation.
     

    eyesinpines

    Active Member
    Mar 4, 2011
    257
    Channel Cat calls it well.

    For the future, note that in a lot of the heavily socialist states, Obama only got 60% ... that's not a big 'mandate' to me. There is a real chance of President Christy in 4 years, esp if the best the Democrats can put up is MOM


    Also take note, that a lot of "very liberal" judges have become more literal when they got moved up to the big house. Once in a while one has turned out to surprise the liberal establishment into thinking they made a mistake in appointing them.
    Are you kidding? Christy???

    After watching him fawn all over Obama at the worst possible time [when he really didn't need to] and all but helping him over the finish line, I as a conservative wouldn't vote for him for dog catcher.

    I would think that there's enough right wing folks that think like me that his White House aspirations are dead...at least I sure hope so. He's got a big mouth that he opened much wider than was needed. A POX on him and his house!

    I respect that he has a job to do in NJ, but the "endorsement" was ill advised and untimely.
     

    Knuckle66

    One of the 365
    Mar 11, 2012
    615
    Hagerstown
    That's electoral numbercrunching. Look at the margins in the swing states. Also look at the rules for amendments. It's a great deal more involved than simply passing legislation.

    You're not understanding what I'm saying. I was using it as an analogy. I wasn't saying that it could actually happen.

    I know takes a whole bunch of stuff to happen correctly to add/change an amendment.
     

    Drmsparks

    Old School Rifleman
    Jun 26, 2007
    8,441
    PG county
    The realistic answer is no change anticipated.

    There you go, the voice of reason. There is no place for that here.

    There is no desire amongst the dems to start a war with the republicans over gun rights.

    Union members brought in Ohio for Obama and 53% of those that voted for him are gun owners. Too big a constituency to offend. There are far fewer anti gun voters (and most of them are in deep blue states) to worry about. They will b*tch and moan about how Obama hasn't dealt with their lame control agenda then vote for him anyway).

    The UN? Mostly a red herring. Nothing they do will affect us in this country for hte most part (well, we might see more parts kits imported and surplus ammo could be harder to find, but I don't think there is much of that left out there). Congress has to approve any treaty with a super majority and that won't happen
     

    QuebecoisWolf

    Ultimate Member
    May 14, 2008
    3,767
    Anne Arundel
    Hope for the best, plan for the worst.

    My guess is aside from the SCOTUS Justices, the answer is "minimal." Some red tape, possibly internet reporting of large ammo sales. We are also going to be our own worst enemy. Obama probably won't put a tax on ammo, but the forces of supply and demand will drive up prices. There probably won't be an assault weapons ban, but we'll be snatching them up so fast that the effect on supply and price is about the same.

    However, history is marked by those one in a million chances and unforeseen events. It's possible, at least in theory, that the Gun Control Lobby could make a huge resurgence. Martin O'Malley or Mike Busch could accidentally discover this forum and launch a huge crusade against the evils of Maryland's far right fringe gun owners (and yesterday proved that Maryland Dems always get what they want).

    The bottom line is that we don't really don't what's going to happen in the next four years.
     

    EL1227

    R.I.P.
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 14, 2010
    20,274
    Does the Navy Scuttle a ship when a Captain leaves or retires from the boat? No, they simply put a new Captain in place and throw on a fresh coat of paint. Just because Obama doesn't have to worry about re-election doesn't mean he will run the country into the ground. Voters would change parties if he does some outlandish things. If you step on the tail of a dog, some will yelp, others will turn and bite you.

    Dream on ...

    The 2012 electorate was bought and paid for, and they will continue to get more freebies to do Obamarx's bidding. I see more and more entitlement 'D's joining the ranks of the unemployed, and gov'mnt and union payrolls with their hands out in exchange for their vote.

    Be prepared for The HildeBeast or Moron Owe'Malley or both in 2016. Without some major shakeout we will be Greece in 8 years or less. And, with any luck, I'll be dead and buried by then, so make sure that they place me face down so the progressive liberals in the PRofMD can ... :kissass:
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,016
    Messages
    7,304,748
    Members
    33,560
    Latest member
    JackW

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom