Are you a lawyer?
A purchase order is an agreement to sell/purchase.
A Form 1 is permission to BUILD.
How are they the same????
To be specific, it is permission to manufacture. Definitely not the same.
Are you a lawyer?
A purchase order is an agreement to sell/purchase.
A Form 1 is permission to BUILD.
How are they the same????
The point is, for SBRs they are taking the date of completion as whether FSA 2013 applies.
That implies that the date of completion also applies to a rifle build. So, IMO, building a banned configuration NOW, even on a lower purchased pre-Oct 1, 2103, would NOT be legal.
No new firearm is created when a lower is assembled. The argument is that the tax stamp is permision to build a new firearm. It implies nothing about making pistols into riles at a later date. Since all lowers were 77r and other they are in fact pistols under the law until converted to riles via SBR process.
You can make or transfer an SBR as long as it's OAL is > 29". Doesn't seem to matter to BATFFE or MSP when the lower was purchased. This is from observation of threads here, nothing more. And the feature test applies until Engage gets a reply back from MSP asking them to show how the law allows an SBR can be both a handgun and a rifle for purposes of the copycat provision. (It's not IMO but we wait.)
IANAL.
Actually the proper response is < 29" according to 281, but yes you're correct.
Not to nitpick guys but I keep seeing >29 inches, we have a lot of new members on here, and the proper response is >=29 inches. That one inch makes a big difference, just say'n
Not to nitpick guys but I keep seeing >29 inches, we have a lot of new members on here, and the proper response is >=29 inches. That one inch makes a big difference, just say'n