TheGoodSoldier
Oath Keeper
This is a pretty nice FAQ list, helped clear up a few things I had floating around my head, thanks!
Most of the laws address detachable magazines outside of the grip. Nothing is bein addressed with handguns with the exception of possibly threaded barrels. The real problem will be buying a handgun that has a magazine > 10 rounds.
Are you saying that if the particular handgun can accept mags > 10 it will be a problem or if it comes with one? If the latter was the problem couldn't you just buy the gun without mags and then get your own out of state?
It's defined in the bill as something that hides or reduces the flash. I really don't think this is ambiguous.
I have updated the FAQ with commentary about the transport issue (which isn't).
It looked to me like if you get your FFL07, you'll be golden. This isn't free, especially with the ITAR fees, but that was how it looked to me.Ok here is a question we are not sure of does 281 forbid manufacturers from Building AK & AR15 rifles in Maryland ? We are a warehouse and ship all of our items,, some in MD but we do service all other states will we be forced to shut our doors because of the new regulations or did they provide provisions for sales shipped outside of MD ? What provisions did they write in for Beretta ?
The level of reduction that meets the law's standard is "any". I doubt there's a mechanism for proving this beforehand. More likely, it'll be like in Cali, where everyone covers their ass by getting one that just flat-out can't do it.The point is, they don't really reduce the flash.
So would it require night firing to prove that it is a "flash suppressor?" And what is the level of reduction that is needed?
ewros do you know where in the bill it says that manufacturers are exempt / I know they had an original amendment for dealers but it looks like it got struck out ?
There's an explicit exemption for licensed manufacturers and dealers that I think would work for you guys.ewros do you know where in the bill it says that manufacturers are exempt / I know they had an original amendment for dealers but it looks like it got struck out ?
The penalties for dealers who make mistakes in their record-keeping are somewhat over-the-top, but that's a different problem.SB281 said:This subtitle does not apply to:
(3) POSSESSION, MANUFACTURE, RECEIPT FOR MANUFACTURE, SHIPMENT FOR MANUFACTURE, purchases, sales, and transport to or by a licensed firearms dealer or manufacturer who is:
(ii)
acting to sell or transfer an assault WEAPON or detachable magazine to a licensed firearm dealer in another state;
OR
(III) ACTING TO RETURN TO A CUSTOMER IN ANOTHER STATE AN ASSAULT WEAPON TRANSFERRED TO THE LICENSED FIREARMS DEALER OR MANUFACTURER UNDER THE TERMS OF A WARRANTY OR FOR REPAIR;
There's an explicit exemption for licensed manufacturers and dealers that I think would work for you guys.
The penalties for dealers who make mistakes in their record-keeping are somewhat over-the-top, but that's a different problem.
FOAD. I'm doing this for free. If you want a properly-sourced document, I'll give you a Paypal link to comp me for my time, which is not as cheap as you may suspect.Would be a more compelling read if you linked to the source text inside the bill. As it stands the FAQ reads like your interpretation of it, which may or may not be accurate.
They're not going to be as helpful given that the "named list" of assault long guns includes copies. Mind you, there's always the chance that the MSP will do another "bulletin 96-1" and tell us that, contrary to all evidence, compliant guns are not considered clones of guns on the assault long guns list. *shrugs*How about the 90s "thumbhole" stocks. That removes the "pistol grip."
I recall the ones for FALs and even AR type fire arms. They just put a thin strap from the pistol grip to the stock.