hairba111
XGMG2
Logic??? Most politicians can't comprehend the word.
br3krj said:How long will it take for the judge to approve or deny the request for a stay? Best guess.
I'll buy that. The "blood in the streets" argument now has so much data to the contrary that you may as well say the sky is green. I don't understand how the anti's can still tow that line. It defies logic.
I'll buy that. The "blood in the streets" argument now has so much data to the contrary that you may as well say the sky is green. I don't understand how the anti's can still tow that line. It defies logic.
You answered your own question. Antis, like most on the left, are not logical. They rely of feelings to make decisions and arrive at conclusions.
Weird? you bet.
I'll buy that. The "blood in the streets" argument now has so much data to the contrary that you may as well say the sky is green. I don't understand how the anti's can still tow that line. It defies logic.
"Get off my boards" lol
I always said that about my ex...
Just be careful, because on those 2 or 3 days a year when the clouds get all pre-tornadic and green-grey, they'll point up and say "SEE!! Toldya!"
The state will cherry-pick the data to their liking and wait for the sky to be "just so".
IANAL, and I understanding where you are coming from, but that logic is getting pretty thin, given the other 30 or so other states that have an established precedence of no substantial crime increase.
I think the cloud Gansler, and company, is waiting for is another incident like the little girl that just got killed in Baltimore. Had not a cop been involved, they would have used that as the poster for gun control.
I see the AG dragging his feet, until the courts force him to comply. Look at the current ruling. It seems pretty clear, yet his contention is that it lacks clarity. What it lacks is a judicial smack down, which is what it is eventually going to take. That, or a change in the law, from the legislative branch.
Legg never actually ordered the state to do something, or to stop doing something. AG's motion for clarification is fair given the nature of Legg's opinion. Once Legg clarifies, depending on the extent of his clarification, there might/will be hell to pay if MSP continues to hold/deny permit applications.
I may have stated this before in another post, but they (AG) remind me of a little kid that is told to do something that they don't want to do, so they just play dumb.
MH
"Get off my boards" lol
Judge: "[insert issue] is not constitutional."
AG: "So that means I can't do it? Or, I can still do it?"
call me crazy, but this feigning of ignorance is so beneath the realm of reality, it baffles truly.