SAF SUES IN MARYLAND OVER HANDGUN PERMIT DENIAL UPDATED 3-5-12

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    MJD438

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Feb 28, 2012
    5,854
    Somewhere in MD
    I have a growing concern.

    I think we were all hoping that if Judge Legg found against the stay that MSP, although appealing to CA4, would in the interim be pushed into issuing permits. However as time goes by, the gap between District and Circuit Court is being compressed.

    Is there a danger that Judge Leggs decision might run so close to the CA4 hearings and the States request for a stay there, that there won't be enough of a time gap for it to make any sense to MSP to isue without G & S, and that they'll simply wait for the CA4 stay request to be decided?
    Hopefully one of our good lawyers will post, but, IIRC, the state would be risking contempt if they lose the stay at District but still sit on applications until they get an answer on a stay motion at CA4.


    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,525
    Westminster USA
    I have a growing concern.

    I think we were all hoping that if Judge Legg found against the stay that MSP, although appealing to CA4, would in the interim be pushed into issuing permits. However as time goes by, the gap between District and Circuit Court is being compressed.

    Is there a danger that Judge Leggs decision might run so close to the CA4 hearings and the States request for a stay there, that there won't be enough of a time gap for it to make any sense to MSP to isue without G & S, and that they'll simply wait for the CA4 stay request to be decided?

    Because any delay if the stay is lifted would be contempt of court and screwing with a Federal Judge is not gonna end well and MD knows this. It won't happen unless MD has more money to pi$$ away and Gansler has drunk even more Kool Aid than we first suspected.
     

    fightinbluhen51

    "Quack Pot Call Honker"
    Oct 31, 2008
    8,974
    I did just catch some good news out of the Circuit for the IL carry case...one of the judges there in orals today called the AG an idiot.

    So...hopefully some good news.
     

    Atlasarmory

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Mar 2, 2009
    3,362
    Glen Burnie
    I have a growing concern.

    I think we were all hoping that if Judge Legg found against the stay that MSP, although appealing to CA4, would in the interim be pushed into issuing permits. However as time goes by, the gap between District and Circuit Court is being compressed.

    Is there a danger that Judge Leggs decision might run so close to the CA4 hearings and the States request for a stay there, that there won't be enough of a time gap for it to make any sense to MSP to isue without G & S, and that they'll simply wait for the CA4 stay request to be decided?

    +1
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Hopefully one of our good lawyers will post, but, IIRC, the state would be risking contempt if they lose the stay at District but still sit on applications until they get an answer on a stay motion at CA4.

    I think that is correct. If the stay is lifted the injunction goes into effect until or unless the CA4 either reimposes the stay pending appeal or reverses on the merits. The state will comply.
     

    2ndCharter

    Based dude w/ lovin' hands
    MDS Supporter
    Apr 19, 2011
    4,899
    Eastern Shore
    Hopefully one of our good lawyers will post, but, IIRC, the state would be risking contempt if they lose the stay at District but still sit on applications until they get an answer on a stay motion at CA4.

    I'd expect them to "slow roll" the process using the backlog as an excuse while they continue to wait it out.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    I did just catch some good news out of the Circuit for the IL carry case...one of the judges there in orals today called the AG an idiot.

    So...hopefully some good news.

    Just finished listening to the tape. Available here:
    http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx

    My call: 3-0 for Gura. (That prediction breaks every rule I have ever followed about not predicting, so I hope I don't have to eat this one).
     

    Mr H

    Unincited Co-Conservative
    I'd expect them to "slow roll" the process using the backlog as an excuse while they continue to wait it out.

    Agree completely.

    Plus, with the spectre of another Very Special Session looming, this is where we need to be alert, and ready to act.

    I still say we could use a "best practices" guidance since many of us may have passed our 90 days should Legg vacate the stay, and be caught in the delaying tactics with no-GSR-needed, approvable, pre-stay applications.
     

    Inigoes

    Head'n for the hills
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 21, 2008
    49,712
    SoMD / West PA
    esqappellate said:
    My call: 3-0 for Gura. (That prediction breaks every rule I have ever followed about not predicting, so I hope I don't have to eat this one).

    Don't worry, if it comes to that.

    Digital crow is tasteless; shocking, but tasteless :)
     

    Rossi357

    Active Member
    Mar 8, 2012
    118
    Sandy Eggo
    Be ready for some harsh definitions of concealed by the legislators.
    Imprinting, inadvertnat exposure (wind blowing your shirt up) , etc.
     

    fightinbluhen51

    "Quack Pot Call Honker"
    Oct 31, 2008
    8,974
    hence the need to be active legislatively. Let's hear it for MSI, our legislative watchdog.
    Which is why, I'll say it again...I hope they DO try to deal with it in a special session. All eyes are upon them for a few short days and on a very, very limited number of topics.

    There will be no 11th hour political cover to run to like what was tried in the Senate on sine die.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Which is why, I'll say it again...I hope they DO try to deal with it in a special session. All eyes are upon them for a few short days and on a very, very limited number of topics.

    There will be no 11th hour political cover to run to like what was tried in the Senate on sine die.

    "Ethernal vigliance is the price of liberty." Thomas Jefferson
     
    Nov 13, 2011
    218
    Bethesda, MD
    Just finished listening to the tape. Available here:
    http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx

    My call: 3-0 for Gura. (That prediction breaks every rule I have ever followed about not predicting, so I hope I don't have to eat this one).

    Wow. Are all judges that rude? I was raised with manners and what those judges do, while people are trying to answer THEIR questions, would never have flown in my house growing up.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,060
    Messages
    7,306,616
    Members
    33,564
    Latest member
    bara4033

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom