Pulled Over by MSP/Guns in Car

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    Exactly. I remember being pulled over for speeding and was asked if I had drugs, firearms, or TANKS!!! I gave him a look and chuckled no. :lol2: Little did they know.....:innocent0

    Yup.. and that tanks joke is why I think is all coming from command.. but some young probationary officers are going to eat it up.. if the NYC pattern holds, Good cops will retire and it will get worse unless we stop it via the courts. Not even sure the courts will.
     

    ironpony

    Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 8, 2013
    7,271
    Davidsonville
    If the case had a Bushmaster sticker visibly on it or obviously a gun case, is that probable cause for search? If asked for a license as OP was is it time for a lawyer? I see this may have been worse, maybe??
    In these times it just makes one wonder. We do have some of the toughest laws.
     

    goose poop

    Member
    Feb 22, 2013
    15
    monkey county
    Thanks all for the responses. Just to keep things in perspective, the crack in my windshield is pretty bad, about 16" right at driver eye level. I think the Trooper had a rookie with him and they were just runnin and gunnin stops. I never saw him until he was behind me, he may have seen the crack as they were coming up behind or beside me. As to leaving the case in plain sight it will be properly covered up next time. Usually I have a ton of decoys and hunting gear in the Tahoe. Better they miss it being covered up than having your firearms taken. As to being hassled I really didn't have that feeling, nor did I think they were on a fishing expedition, and I definitely knew to cooperate to the degree I felt legally responsible, and kept my hands in plain site. I have had more issues with Federal Game Wardens than anyone else. I know how cops work, their line of questioning, play good cop/bad cop, how they try to trip you up. Bottom line is they were runnin and gunnin stops, came across firearms, and were doing their job making sure I wasn't a prohibited person. Pisser was it took 30 minutes. I have a number of friends that are cops, 1 is a Rockville City LT, another 20yr PO3 with monkey co, and another I hunt with regularly the head of Balt City fugitive warrant task force. They are all good dudes, pro 2a and are just as disgusted with MD as we all are. The 2 troopers yesterday had a job to do and they did it. Scary thing though is talking to my moco bro he said he was attached to MSP for awhile, he said I would be shocked by their real motives. He did not elaborate.

    Bottom line it would behoove us all when traveling with our firearms to have a plan of action if one ever finds them self in my situation or worse. Think about what you are willing to say, legally obligated to say, and how to say what you need to say without escalating the situation. I am definitely going to do some more research so I have more than a precursory understanding of MD firearm laws, as archaic as they are, and may make a cheat sheet so I throw some statute numbers at them in case I am ever pulled over again.

    BTW I took the scenic route on the way home.

    Poop
     

    Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    See making sure you are not a prohibited person is fishing.. period.

    This is how it starts.. if you think its OK for police to presume without any reasonable suspicion that you may be a prohibited person then you must surely support a foid card to make tgecprocess faster. If we do not make progress in this election foid is on the table.

    I object to the presumption of criminality on the part of the police and you should too. If you do not you are digging the choke in which you can bury the rest of your civil liberties.

    Mark these words. FOID is coming if this nonsense continues.

    .and what make you think that they can't pull up any criminal history you might have to see if you were prohibited?

    You were unlawfully detained IMHO. IANAL.
     

    kgain673

    I'm sorry for the typos!!
    Dec 18, 2007
    1,820
    Lots of bad information going on around here again, lots. Most mandated training is focused on how to stop killing and not get yourself killed. But anyway MD rushed these laws and almost no one knows what they are. Also that trooper may have been asking dumb questions on purpose you never know. No one got arrested, no guns got seized, repair order issued. Glass gonna get fixed.
     

    ericoak

    don't drop Aboma on me
    Feb 20, 2010
    6,806
    Howard County
    Part of the "Guns Everywhere" Georgia just signed into law are these provisions:

    The police are specifically prohibited from:
    1. Stopping and questioning you over gun possession without suspicion of another crime being committed.
    2. You are not obligated to tell officers if you are carrying firearms.
    3. Creating a database of gun owners

    Combined with face to face handgun sales and there is no way they check in their system whether you legally posses a firearm.

    Screw the People's Republic of Maryland and their innocent until proven guilty tactics.
    Come on down to a real state.
     

    Blackstar65

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 27, 2010
    1,002
    Most new officers can't talk to citizens. They get so nervous that the stumble through what they want to say. Its usually our biggest issue to overcome as trainers. The rookie trooper was most likely referring to a HQL License. The FTT (Field Training Trooper) like told him to go back up and ask if their were any weapons in the vehicle because he missed it the first time which is a big officer safety issue. Being that he missed the plain view weapons may have pushed his nervousness to a higher level due to the pending ass chewing when the stop was over. I am not even going to say the paper work question was fishing it may have just been nerves or a misinterpretation of the law which happens with new officers hence the field training program. Fishing would have been asking to search the vehicle. Before E-tix 30 minutes wasn't a long time for stop.
     
    Oct 21, 2008
    9,273
    St Mary's
    Most new officers can't talk to citizens. They get so nervous that the stumble through what they want to say. Its usually our biggest issue to overcome as trainers. The rookie trooper was most likely referring to a HQL License. The FTT (Field Training Trooper) like told him to go back up and ask if their were any weapons in the vehicle because he missed it the first time which is a big officer safety issue. Being that he missed the plain view weapons may have pushed his nervousness to a higher level due to the pending ass chewing when the stop was over. I am not even going to say the paper work question was fishing it may have just been nerves or a misinterpretation of the law which happens with new officers hence the field training program. Fishing would have been asking to search the vehicle. Before E-tix 30 minutes wasn't a long time for stop.

    You allude to the fact that asking if firearms are present is SOP. I would hope it isn't. Nor have I been asked that in the past.
     

    TheBert

    The Member
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 10, 2013
    7,734
    Gaithersburg, Maryland
    He could have been from somewhere where a FOID card is necessary and thats the norm.....who know's. You didn't get a ticket and there was no search.


    If he is wearing the uniform of and showing a badge for the MSP I would hope that he has received some education in and has knowledge of Maryland's laws. The excuse that he comes from a place, another state, that has a FOID doesn't float.
     

    Brooklyn

    I stand with John Locke.
    Jan 20, 2013
    13,095
    Plan D? Not worth the hassle.
    Most new officers can't talk to citizens. They get so nervous that the stumble through what they want to say. Its usually our biggest issue to overcome as trainers. The rookie trooper was most likely referring to a HQL License. The FTT (Field Training Trooper) like told him to go back up and ask if their were any weapons in the vehicle because he missed it the first time which is a big officer safety issue. Being that he missed the plain view weapons may have pushed his nervousness to a higher level due to the pending ass chewing when the stop was over. I am not even going to say the paper work question was fishing it may have just been nerves or a misinterpretation of the law which happens with new officers hence the field training program. Fishing would have been asking to search the vehicle. Before E-tix 30 minutes wasn't a long time for stop.

    Certainly possible.. but about those 2 other units that responded.... sound like a lot of manpower over an sop question. No chance it was for intimidation value, right? ..

    Op did well. But he was being detained and questioned. Any idea why?
    .
     

    joppaj

    Sheepdog
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Apr 11, 2008
    46,725
    MD
    You allude to the fact that asking if firearms are present is SOP. I would hope it isn't. Nor have I been asked that in the past.

    SG,

    I think Blackstar's point is that the trainer likely saw the cases and told Rook to go back and ask since Rook didn't seem to notice them. If a cop sees cases, I'd imagine they're going to ask.
     

    Name Taken

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 23, 2010
    11,891
    Central
    Certainly possible.. but about those 2 other units that responded.... sound like a lot of manpower over an sop question.

    Did they happen to be driving by and see this stop and drop in? Maybe they were all going to meet for lunch after the stop? If officers are going to a non critical call and see another agency on the side of the road on a stop they almost always pull over and check on them or chat.

    It really is standard practice if an officer drivers past another on a traffic stop to pull over and check on them. It's also normal when an officer does a traffic stop if others aren't doing anything to drive over there to check on the officer.

    I also think if they were trying to "intimidate" as you described they would have at least asked for a consent search? I mean that's only logical.
     

    Doctor_M

    Certified Mad Scientist
    MDS Supporter
    My appologies to the law enforcement community, but every day I am less and less inclined to asnwer anything outside of name, rank, and serial number.

    I am surprised that they didn ask if your weapons were loaded.... I would think that would have been a concern. If they had asked to see if the weapons were unloaded, would you have to comply? This stuff makes my head hurt.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,631
    Messages
    7,289,177
    Members
    33,489
    Latest member
    Nelsonbencasey

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom