proposed parts kit and 80% lower ban

[chappy444]

time to make some calls.

SEC. 101. DO-IT-YOURSELF ASSAULT WEAPON BAN.
(b) Prohibited Acts- It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, offer for sale, manufacture for sale, or import into the United States for sale, to a consumer–

(1) an assault weapon parts kit; or

SEC. 103. DEFINITIONS.
(a) Terms- For purposes of this title–

(1) the term ‘assault weapon parts kit’ means any part or combination of parts not designed and intended for repair or replacement but designed and intended to enable a consumer who possesses all such necessary parts to assemble a semiautomatic assault weapon;



http://gunssavelives.net/blog/gun-l...ar-15-lower-parts-kits-barrels-and-receivers/

 

[Mr H]

This seems to be an enhancement of the crap Feinschwein wanted to force through after December. The Santa Monica shooting spree brought the 80% lowers into the mix.

They are looking for any way possible to cripple and dry up the firearms industry, regardless of the effects.

 

[Kelson1066]

Trying to take another bite at the apple I think this will be a harder sell if you ban 80% then someone will come up with 75% and it will go on and on until you ban the sale of aluminum, polymers, etc.

I think this also limits access to spare parts because some vendors will say that since they cannot confirm the part is for a currently existing firearm "better safe than sorry."

 

[sleev-les]

I see this one going nowhere. The libs are reaching as usual, but highly doubt anything comes of it.

 

[Logan]

There's no end to the gun grabbing, now parts grabbing.

 

[r3t1awr3yd]

There's no end to the gun grabbing, now parts grabbing.

Which might not be a bad thing.

Oh GUN parts?!

 

[Brooklyn]

time to make some calls.

SEC. 101. DO-IT-YOURSELF ASSAULT WEAPON BAN.
(b) Prohibited Acts- It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, offer for sale, manufacture for sale, or import into the United States for sale, to a consumer–

(1) an assault weapon parts kit; or

SEC. 103. DEFINITIONS.
(a) Terms- For purposes of this title–

(1) the term ‘assault weapon parts kit’ means any part or combination of parts not designed and intended for repair or replacement but designed and intended to enable a consumer who possesses all such necessary parts to assemble a semiautomatic assault weapon;



http://gunssavelives.net/blog/gun-l...ar-15-lower-parts-kits-barrels-and-receivers/

So when is a repair kit not a repair kit? Only the shadow knows...

 

[aireyc]

Haha, an 80% ban. These stooges are hilarious. What are they going to ban next, blocks of aluminum?

 

[fabsroman]

Haha, an 80% ban. These stooges are hilarious. What are they going to ban next, blocks of aluminum?

They could ban the manufacture of "assault weapons" whether for resale or personal consumption.

Easy to say that this will go nowhere. My parents kept telling me SB28 wasn't going anywhere at all and that I should stop looking at houses in Richmond. Yeah, look how that went.

 

[-Z/28-]

(1) the term ‘assault weapon parts kit’ means any part or combination of parts not designed and intended for repair or replacement but designed and intended to enable a consumer who possesses all such necessary parts to assemble a semiautomatic assault weapon;

Umm, kits don't come with all the necessary parts. No receivers, no barrels.

 

[Jed195]

Can we just set some shaped charges on the san andreas fault and lose these california dumbasses and the state into the pacific ocean.

 

[Evil Twin]

 

[Ab_Normal]

(1) the term ‘assault weapon parts kit’ means any part or combination of parts not designed and intended for repair or replacement but designed and intended to enable a consumer who possesses all such necessary parts to assemble a semiautomatic assault weapon;

Umm, kits don't come with all the necessary parts. No receivers, no barrels.

That is the nugget that needs to be focused on. Then they will strip out not designed and intended for repair or replacement but and then we have a real problem.

 

[Brooklyn]

That is the nugget that needs to be focused on. Then they will strip out not designed and intended for repair or replacement but and then we have a real problem.

Not very likely. A ban on springs?

Would lead to a national firearms Lic in order to allow enforcement. I think we have enough gun friendly states to keep it at bay for a while.

 

[Ab_Normal]

Not very likely. A ban on springs?

Would lead to a national firearms Lic in order to allow enforcement. I think we have enough gun friendly states to keep it at bay for a while.

Never say never not very likely.

 

[aireyc]

They could ban the manufacture of "assault weapons" whether for resale or personal consumption.

Easy to say that this will go nowhere. My parents kept telling me SB28 wasn't going anywhere at all and that I should stop looking at houses in Richmond. Yeah, look how that went.

As much as I wish my post were 100% sarcastic, I fully agree with you. I don't remember where I read it, but I did see a proposed law that effectively did ban certain types of materials due to the ability to make them into firearms. It was some very vague language.

 

[Brooklyn]

They could ban the manufacture of "assault weapons" whether for resale or personal consumption.

Easy to say that this will go nowhere. My parents kept telling me SB28 wasn't going anywhere at all and that I should stop looking at houses in Richmond. Yeah, look how that went.

Yes they could.. but there is that pesky 10th amendment and the 2nd and the 4th and f...k the 5th.

I think they are OK with parts of the first....

Really we need to stay alert to be sure. But we have issues that are more likely -- like an ammo tax or log...

Not suggesting complacency just focus in tactical order....

 

[johnnyb2]

Would you REALLY want Feinschwein grabbing YOUR PARTS? :-) Not me, I stopped taking those home about 30 years ago.................ok.....20 years ago :-)

 

[MEGARMS]

I see this one going nowhere. The libs are reaching as usual, but highly doubt anything comes of it.

+1 here - It is unlikely that they will be able to ban parts if they weren't able to pass an all out ban. As someone else said, there are enough gun friendly states to keep legislation like this from passing on a Federal level.

 

[john_bud]

+1 here - It is unlikely that they will be able to ban parts if they weren't able to pass an all out ban. As someone else said, there are enough gun friendly states to keep legislation like this from passing on a Federal level.

There are enough gun friendly states now.... but that will not be the case 10 years after immigration reform. Remember california used to be gun friendly...