squirrels
Who cooks for you?
- Jan 25, 2008
- 4,021
HB45 was in a pre-Woollard world. Smigiel probably thought it'd be easier to get it through that way. It IS a bit irrelevant at this time, though. Honestly, "G&S" needs to be stricken from the form entirely.
Why is everyone so divided on this issue? Not only do we have Smigiel standing alone with HB45, we also have HB430 and 488, which as far as I can tell, do EXACTLY the same thing, and the sponsorship in the house is divided between the two bills. Why can't everyone get behind the same bill??
If the law can be changed at the legislative layer, wouldn't it be good to do that? Or do we want a court-decision as precedent so they can't re-enact it a few years down the road?
Why is everyone so divided on this issue? Not only do we have Smigiel standing alone with HB45, we also have HB430 and 488, which as far as I can tell, do EXACTLY the same thing, and the sponsorship in the house is divided between the two bills. Why can't everyone get behind the same bill??
If the law can be changed at the legislative layer, wouldn't it be good to do that? Or do we want a court-decision as precedent so they can't re-enact it a few years down the road?