fleaman64
Ultimate Member
- May 12, 2011
- 1,367
Fvch Maryland...
Notice of Permit Revocation
- Thread starter mouzzer
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Mooseman
R.I.P.- Hooligan #4
Sadly, Maryland looks at your permit like a part of your work issued equipment. In their eyes, it is like your badge or uniform. These must be returned to your employer upon your cessation of working there. The permit was issued because you worked there. Now that you are no longer employed there, the permit must be returned. Sorry.
Biggfoot44
Ultimate Member
- Aug 2, 2009
- 33,507
Thank you for your service, etc . That had nothing to do with recieving or retaining your permit in Maryland.
It would seem your Permit was employment related, and presumably restricted to On Duty, or at most On Duty , and to/ from home.
When said employment ends, the Permit is no longer valid. You can have up to a 30 day window before physically turning it in ( albeit not exercising it ) in order to obtain new employment that would also qualify for employment related Permit, additionally provideed that the Job Description matches exactly word for word. ie Security Gaurd not = Investagator , not = Driver/ Gaurd , not = Investagator, etc.
It's wrong, It's unfair, but It's Maryland.
It would seem your Permit was employment related, and presumably restricted to On Duty, or at most On Duty , and to/ from home.
When said employment ends, the Permit is no longer valid. You can have up to a 30 day window before physically turning it in ( albeit not exercising it ) in order to obtain new employment that would also qualify for employment related Permit, additionally provideed that the Job Description matches exactly word for word. ie Security Gaurd not = Investagator , not = Driver/ Gaurd , not = Investagator, etc.
It's wrong, It's unfair, but It's Maryland.
rtmhunter
Ammo Hoarder
Thank you very much for your service. As others have said, you won't win this one. They don't care about anything in this God forsaken state except getting more of your money. We are all nothing more than walking, talking ATM's for the lazy.
- Feb 4, 2013
- 28,175
WRONG
Realize that a few years ago, the legislature voted to make it easier for THEM to get a carry permit.
They don't want YOU to have a carry permit or have a firearm. They want THEM to have both.
There are surprisingly few member of the GA who have a carry permit. I believe the count stands at 2.
b00sh
Active Member
- Feb 7, 2013
- 717
Wow that's surprising.
Eh .. most are anti gun. There is no surprise there.
- Nov 2, 2009
- 5,001
Of course. I was referring to the serfs, not the ruling class. Never forget...they consider us to be their enemies.
No surprises here. If you put down your occupation as the reason for the need of the permit and now that occupation no longer exists, then they yank your permit. It would have been interesting to see if you had added "all lawful purposes" to your reasons, if they would have yanked it.
b00sh
Active Member
- Feb 7, 2013
- 717
There's almost 200 people and only 2 have a permit. That's like 1%.
oldsarge
Old & Crusty
My permit is work related. I only have it because of my job. It states right on the back that it is only valid when not working. This is the only restriction I have and it is fine with me since when I'm at work, I have an issued weapon to carry whenever I need it.
iobidder
1 point'er
The few, the proud
typo meant minus....but you already knew that.
There is a problem with your line of thinking. Maryland does not consider this a Right......
This...
Sent from one of my 15 phones from your front door
The Navy or his employer gave him up to the MSP.
CypherPunk
Opinions Are My Own
- Apr 6, 2012
- 3,907
I know at least two off the top of my head... And I am sure they made the records private in October for reasons that are broader than protecting permit holders.
iobidder
1 point'er
Looks like a grammatical error
PIA requests were done on this in the last 2 years or so. Only 2 had them. Maybe there are more now. Regardless, I am glad they made the data private.
oldsarge
Old & Crusty
No error. This is what my permit states on the back. I thought it was weird the first time I saw it but the more I thought about it, in my line of work, it makes sense. The only other thing it states is that I cannot use it for any other type of employment.
This. The job hosted your permit. You as a citizen did not. You just had an armed security permit, right? People think you might have had a ccw permit.
Why do people think they should still be able to carry when they are no longer working the gate or site they were at, not employed with the company?
sent from somewhere in the world.
Why?
Someone employed as an armed guard for a security company had their armed permit sponsored by that company they work for.
No longer working for that company = no longer needing a permit.
Why is this so hard for people to comprehend?
It isn't like he had his own CCW permit(what many here want) and all of the sudden they yanked it. It's an employment issue. Simple as that. His character or integrity wasn't attacked.
sent from somewhere in the world.
