JamesBailey
Form Factor'ed!
So the textbooks say that making the blunt meplat less blunt improves the form factor of a bullet, thereby improving its BC and resulting external ballistics. Small bullets are especially helped because their meplat to caliber diameter ratio is high (for example a 77gr SMK has a meplat of 0.064" to its .224" diameter, or .29 meplat to caliber, vs a 175gr SMK's .21). This is of interest to me because I reload and shoot the small calibers - .224 and .264.
Using a formula that estimates form factors, I calculated that if I could reduce a .224 and .264 meplat by 0.02, I could improve the form factor by ~7%. A 7% improvement in the form factor reduces the wind drift of a 77gr SMK .224 at 600yds by 8% and reduces the wind drift of a 142gr SMK .264 at 1000yds by 11%. Trajectory is also flatter. Or so the text book says.
My questions are:
(1) does anyone have any comments on meplat pointing? Any real world ballistic data?
(2) does anyone have any tools to recommend for meplat pointing? Midway has a die, but it costs big bucks ($200+).
thanks for any advice.
Using a formula that estimates form factors, I calculated that if I could reduce a .224 and .264 meplat by 0.02, I could improve the form factor by ~7%. A 7% improvement in the form factor reduces the wind drift of a 77gr SMK .224 at 600yds by 8% and reduces the wind drift of a 142gr SMK .264 at 1000yds by 11%. Trajectory is also flatter. Or so the text book says.
My questions are:
(1) does anyone have any comments on meplat pointing? Any real world ballistic data?
(2) does anyone have any tools to recommend for meplat pointing? Midway has a die, but it costs big bucks ($200+).
thanks for any advice.