esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
No injury due to Mr Syke's being able to set up his FFL in DC at the Metro PD building. This all happened after the case was filed in District.
Yes, DC mooted this one into a case without Injury, ergo no Standing...
Sucks, this one was a well-intentioned case with good potential until DC mooted it.
Will Gura / SAF be able to collect fees?
No. And actually I do beleive the district can file for fees against the plaintiffs.I would think not.
No injury due to Mr Syke's being able to set up his FFL in DC at the Metro PD building. This all happened after the case was filed in District.
Yes, DC mooted this one into a case without Injury, ergo no Standing...
Sucks, this one was a well-intentioned case with good potential until DC mooted it.
Wanna bet that Mr. Sykes' District-sponsored FFL location will go the way of budget cuts or some other lame excuse to do away with the only legitimate way to import a handgun into DC now that the case has been mooted ?
I wonder what Emily Miller will have to say about it since she had many words to say about 'the process' in her series ?
No. And actually I do beleive the district can file for fees against the plaintiffs.
Will Gura / SAF be able to collect fees?
I think this could easily have gone either way on the standing issue. I read the opinion as saying "condoms, cars and chardonnay good, guns bad." I think the distinctions in the cases they cited are specious.
I agree with Gura on this. The standing holding is egregiously wrong.
I agree with Gura on this. The standing holding is egregiously wrong.
Looks like this is only challenging the standing.