- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,802
Apparently, it can be done by a "pro". Jerry reels off 10 rounds in just over a second. Doubt an average joe could do it.
Frosh and Fader got this one downloaded now..
Apparently, it can be done by a "pro". Jerry reels off 10 rounds in just over a second. Doubt an average joe could do it.
I was under the impression an En Banc request was not voted on at the Circuit but had to be heard. I thought a vote for CERT by SCOTUS was the only vote that decided a rehearing.
Is this incorrect?
Frosh and Fader got this one downloaded now..
Frosh and Fader got this one downloaded now..
I was under the impression an En Banc request was not voted on at the Circuit but had to be heard. I thought a vote for CERT by SCOTUS was the only vote that decided a rehearing.
Is this incorrect?
I assume that can backfire for plaintiff Counsil, but; I'd do it just on principal alone.
Also, it's Fader not Faber. Just FYI since I don't get to correct you except once every century.
thanks for schooling me Esq.
One other question. How is an En Banc petition decided without the judges voting? I am confused sorry.
Perhaps the biggest whopper Fader told during the argument was that an AR15 and the other newly banned AW are vastly more dangerous than the machine guns that were available in 1934 when the NFA was enacted into law. Someone should ask Faber whether an AR15 is really more dangerous than a Browning water cooled .30 machine gun M1917 or air cooled M1919 on a tripod. Or even a .45 Tommy Gun with a drum mag. Hell, the M2 .50 dates back to before 1934. You can kill armor with that with the right ammo. If Fader actually believes this nonsense, then he is wholly and willfully ill-informed at a minimum (there is a duty to inquire before you make these sorts of assertions in court). If he knows better, then he lied to the court.
EDIT: If I were counsel, I would be sorely tempted to file a 28j post argument letter on this point. If only to make Faber and the State look like idiots by further undermining their credibility.
Any update?? 2 Weeks....
Any update?? 2 Weeks....
Someone will most likely make a new thread when a decision is made. I give it about two more weeks.
For those sitting on the edges of their seats waiting for this opinion, you can sign up for daily e-mail alerts that list/link to the opinions released each day.
https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USFEDCOURTS/subscriber/new