When people bring up the idea of purchasing more lowers, people always chime in with having more uppers makes more sense. I don't understand the logic in this line of thinking.
On October 1st ar15 are no longer legal to purchase. You can buy all the uppers you want. Lowers will be banned. People are stocking up on lowers because that will be the determining factor. Want purchase more lowers to build complete rifles later.
Why would yoh want to accumulate more uppers than lowers? It really doesn't make sense if you only have 3 lowers and 6 or more uppers. What would happen should a lower breaks for some unfortunate reason?
You can get 5 to 10 lowers for a single upper. With the potential to build every single one. At this point in time it would be bad economy and poor logic to stock up on uppers while you only have 3 lowers. Or to have 2 or three more uppers than you have lowers.
So what have I missed on the reasoning of having more uppers than lowers right not with the impending law looming?
On October 1st ar15 are no longer legal to purchase. You can buy all the uppers you want. Lowers will be banned. People are stocking up on lowers because that will be the determining factor. Want purchase more lowers to build complete rifles later.
Why would yoh want to accumulate more uppers than lowers? It really doesn't make sense if you only have 3 lowers and 6 or more uppers. What would happen should a lower breaks for some unfortunate reason?
You can get 5 to 10 lowers for a single upper. With the potential to build every single one. At this point in time it would be bad economy and poor logic to stock up on uppers while you only have 3 lowers. Or to have 2 or three more uppers than you have lowers.
So what have I missed on the reasoning of having more uppers than lowers right not with the impending law looming?