nighthawk2099
Ultimate Member
+1 Agreed.
It's one thing to kill someone in defense of your life or the life of others, but there is already too much killing over property. Yeah, I worked hard for what I own, but like Deacon51 said, that's what insurance is for. There is no value comparison between property and a person's life.
On the other hand, if said bad guy threatens my life (put a gun in my face, etc.) in the process of taking said property, that's a different story. At that point, the act has escalated from petty theft to armed robbery. I would kill based on the threat to my life, but not the theft of the property.
Think of it this way, if the person were to be caught and tried, what is the max penalty they would get (in a perfect world). I don't think the death penalty has ever been handed down to a person charged with Grand Larceny (assuming they didn't kill/injure someone in the process).
It's one thing to kill someone in defense of your life or the life of others, but there is already too much killing over property. Yeah, I worked hard for what I own, but like Deacon51 said, that's what insurance is for. There is no value comparison between property and a person's life.
On the other hand, if said bad guy threatens my life (put a gun in my face, etc.) in the process of taking said property, that's a different story. At that point, the act has escalated from petty theft to armed robbery. I would kill based on the threat to my life, but not the theft of the property.
Think of it this way, if the person were to be caught and tried, what is the max penalty they would get (in a perfect world). I don't think the death penalty has ever been handed down to a person charged with Grand Larceny (assuming they didn't kill/injure someone in the process).