I am betting he wants the firearm to transmit its location as well. So that would also require a transmitter of some sort. More power consumption, Depending on where it is mounted in the handgun (grip)the signal would be diminished/cancelled just by simply holding the firearm.
I could see this being gutted and amended as a bill requiring all new handguns to be manufactured with an RFID chip. They would likely state that such a chip would be able to store the data and fingerprints of every owner or some crap.
And then, how are they going to keep the charged? Another law that says all firearms must be plugged into a charger for X hours per day?????
Criminals are meticulous about maintaining things that are going to report their whereabouts and they are not about to disable such devices either because that would be wrong.
Carrying a device that jams the signal or transmits some other guns hacked information would be pretty simple as proven with RFID technology. But as you point out, that would be wrong.
I say incorporate gps tracking devices in the bullets themselves.
That way, any criminal getting away after being shot can be located at the nearest emergency room, flop house, or skank pad.
Just spit-balling here.
In light of the state's secure handling of sensitive personal information of gun owners in the past, we can all sleep well knowing the system would never be hacked by burglars looking to score a few guns. Is this fools memory so poor as to have forgotten the furor over the NSA's phone snooping?
In order to grasp their line of thinking, you must step out of your freedom loving, responsible citizen mindset for a brief moment and consider the mentality of some legislators that we are mere subjects to be monitored and controlled, and that privacy/respect for our "little lives" is irrelative to their grand plans.
Plus, this is a large proposed task force whose time could be better spend working on more relevant, more practical issues.