sykesville
Ultimate Member
But if you're willing to go die for your country in some worthless muslim extremist hell hole, we'll gladly outfit you with all sorts of guns at age 18.
I hope they are exhausted. And I hope that when they keep seeing us coming back year after year they become more and more exhausted until they change these crappy laws.
They need a really big tragedy so they can pass new and more restrictive laws over the corpses of dozens of children. That's what he is really saying.
LOL everything that is legal, is called a loophole now?
LOL everything that is legal, is called a loophole now?
Hate to say it and call me a conspirocy theorist, but sounds like a false flag event. Timing - 1 week before State of the Union, 2 weeks into the MD General Assy, 1 1/2 weeks before the big Diane Sawyer "It's for the cildren" special on kids with guns. All too convenient. And guess what, the perp was 19 so this will go down a child event!
All the debates are fine, but I think the salient point here is that the ever-increasing use of guns (of all types) to kill in public places is a clear indicator that something's gone seriously askew in our society (to put it mildly). Yes, most(?) of the trigger men are lunatics who've been set free to roam our streets (how many times have you almost hit one of the psychotic pan-handlers on Rockville Pike?!), but many are rooted in young mens' inability to control their anger and/or work out personal demons without resorting to lethal aggression and violence.
Meanwhile, the average soccer mom or feminized dad, neither of whom've ever been closer to a real firearm than the remote on their tv set (which rarely tunes into the news due to all the bad news), can't really be faulted for thinking that if you eliminate the guns, you eliminate the likelihood of their families' being exposed to these horrific shootings. In this context, can you really blame them for voting for politicians who share their perspective?
1. This guy only used three shots--I see a resurgence of double-barrel shotguns.
2. Wasn't the gun purchased in December? How long of a cooling off period do we need?
This guy would have used a knife or machete if he didn't have a gun.
The article says the gun store owner, in hindsight, wished he "had dug in" to the transaction a little more now that he knows what happened.
Cut the shop owner some slack. He's already said that the buyer didn't appear odd or of concern at the time of purchase, or afterward.
Now the guy has to live with the crap that the media will be dumping on him, and deal with the mobs with pitchforks and flaming torches that will be howling for his blood (and their fair share of media attention) outside his business and his home.
Have to wonder if the taxi cab driver is feeling the same remorse. Have to wonder if the media is going after the taxi cab driver for not asking what was in the bag. Does the guy's mother feel the same remorse? The gun shop owner is dealing with his conscience, but there really is nothing that he could have done to prevent this mess. If the guy passed the NICS check, he was going to get a shotgun from some vendor, even if it wasn't that specific vendor. I can sympathize with the shop owner though and deal with the same issues in my practice.