FPC VICTORY: Federal Judge Blocks Delaware Ban on Self-Built Firearm Possession, Home Manufacturing

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • bcr229

    FFL/SOT
    Jul 15, 2011
    1,355
    Inwood, WV
    Racking up the wins! And yes I expect it will be appealed.


    WILMINGTON, DE (September 23, 2022) – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that United States District Judge Maryellen Noreika issued an order enjoining Delaware’s bans on self-manufacturing and possession of home-built firearms in its Rigby v. Jennings lawsuit. The opinion and order can be viewed at FPCLaw.org.

    “These statutes burden constitutionally protected conduct because possession of firearms and firearm frames and receivers is within the scope of the Second Amendment’s right to ‘keep and bear Arms’ and Defendant has not shown that these firearms and components are not commonly owned by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,” wrote Judge Noreika in her opinion. “Further, Defendant has offered no evidence that these statutes are consistent with the nation’s history of firearm regulation.”

    The Court went on to hold that “the right to keep and bear arms implies a corresponding right to manufacture arms. Indeed, the right to keep and bear arms would be meaningless if no individual or entity could manufacture a firearm. Thus, if possessing untraceable firearms is protected by the Second Amendment, then so too is manufacturing them.”

    The Court’s Order states in pertinent part that: “Defendant [Delaware Attorney General Kathy Jennings], her officers, agents, servants, employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with her, and all persons who have notice of the injunction are preliminarily enjoined from enforcing 11 Del. C. § 1459A(b); 11 Del. C. § 1463(a); 11 Del. C. § 1463(c)(1) and from enforcing 11 Del. C. 1463(b) to the extent that the Court has found it likely unconstitutional (i.e. the statute’s provisions that bar the manufacturing and assembly of untraceable firearms, but not the prohibitions against distributing untraceable firearms).” The Order issued today further denied the State’s motion to dismiss in its entirety.

    “The self-manufacture of arms is deeply rooted in American history,” said FPC Law’s Director of Constitutional Studies, Joseph Greenlee. “It has been a celebrated tradition since the earliest colonial days, it helped save America’s war for Independence, it was essential to western expansion, and it has led to many of the most innovative technological breakthroughs in our nation’s history. We are pleased that the court recognized this essential element of the right to keep and bear arms and will continue to fiercely advocate for its protection.”

    “Yet another Court has recognized the expansive natural and individual right that is protected by the Second Amendment–in this case, the individual right to manufacture one’s own self-defense tools,” said Cody J. Wisniewski, FPC’s Senior Attorney for Constitutional Litigation. “FPC has notched another post-Bruen win, not only demonstrating how important the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision is, but further demonstrating that FPC has the most effective and expansive program dedicated to fighting for individual’s Second Amendment protected rights in courtrooms across the nation.”

    “Limiting the means by which peaceable people acquire arms is about one thing: the unconstitutional and immoral monopolization of power,” said FPC Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack. “The state is not entitled to cut off access to self-manufacturing of arms under the Second Amendment, period.”

    This decision marks the first-ever federal Second Amendment decision upholding the fundamental right to self-manufacture arms. FPC will continue to aggressively litigate to protect and restore the right to self-manufacture arms in this and cases throughout the United States, including VanDerStock v. ATF, Renna v. Bonta, Palmer v. Sisolak, Fahr v. San Diego, and others.

    Individuals who would like to Join the FPC Grassroots Army and support important pro-rights lawsuits and programs can sign up at JoinFPC.org. Individuals and organizations wanting to support charitable efforts in support of the restoration of Second Amendment and other natural rights can also make a tax-deductible donation to the FPC Action Foundation. For more on FPC’s lawsuits and other pro-Second Amendment initiatives, visit FPCLegal.org and follow FPC on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube.

    Firearms Policy Coalition (firearmspolicy.org), a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization, exists to create a world of maximal human liberty, defend constitutional rights, advance individual liberty, and restore freedom. FPC’s efforts are focused on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms and adjacent issues including freedom of speech, due process, unlawful searches and seizures, separation of powers, asset forfeitures, privacy, encryption, and limited government. The FPC team are next-generation advocates working to achieve the Organization’s strategic objectives through litigation, research, scholarly publications, amicus briefing, legislative and regulatory action, grassroots activism, education, outreach, and other programs.

    FPC Law (FPCLaw.org) is the nation’s first and largest public interest legal team focused on the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the leader in the Second Amendment litigation and research space.
     

    sclag22

    Active Member
    Jan 9, 2013
    646
    Fred Co.
    I've been enjoying this guy on YouTube. He basically says, no precedent from 1791 and the law shouldn't focus on the fact that criminals use guns and ignore the fact that many many more law abiding citizens use them. Glad I didn't get my blocks of aluminum engraved yet.

     

    bcr229

    FFL/SOT
    Jul 15, 2011
    1,355
    Inwood, WV

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,211
    Anne Arundel County
    Sorry, I missed that one. It'll have nationwide implications though if the feds fight all the way to the USSC.
    Unfortunately it's in 3rd CA, so even if the District decision is upheld at Appellate level, it won't be binding precedent in 4CA where we are, until and unless the case makes it to SCOTUS in a 5-7 years.
     

    bcr229

    FFL/SOT
    Jul 15, 2011
    1,355
    Inwood, WV
    Unfortunately it's in 3rd CA, so even if the District decision is upheld at Appellate level, it won't be binding precedent in 4CA where we are, until and unless the case makes it to SCOTUS in a 5-7 years.
    FPC has filed challenges to self-manufacturing bans in other circuits including the Ninth. Unless every other court gets it right and throws out the ban we'll end up with split decisions... which I thought increased the likelihood of the USSC taking a case.
     

    Allen65

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Jun 29, 2013
    7,211
    Anne Arundel County
    FPC has filed challenges to self-manufacturing bans in other circuits including the Ninth. Unless every other court gets it right and throws out the ban we'll end up with split decisions... which I thought increased the likelihood of the USSC taking a case.
    My concern is more about how many years it will take for one of those cases to make it back to SCOTUS, and what the Court's makeup will be when it does. The Antis may try to run out Thomas' biological clock with delay after delay after delay.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,038
    Messages
    7,305,868
    Members
    33,561
    Latest member
    Davidbanner

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom