Dems Introduce Legislation to Outlaw All Handgun Sales, Fund Gun Control Research

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • K31

    "Part of that Ultra MAGA Crowd"
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 15, 2006
    35,717
    AA county
    Please, please, liberals, pin your hopes on gun control in 2016 since you don't have anything else to talk about.

    Smart Gun is an oxymoron.
     

    Reptile

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 29, 2014
    7,282
    Columbia MD
    Since the Dems weren't content with stopping online ammo sales and mandating firearms insurance.

    http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/20...-all-handgun-sales-fund-gun-control-research/

    Keep in mind that liberals have no real interest in outlawing gun sales. If they succeeded it would be like a dog finally catching a car it was chasing. They wouldn't know what to do politically.

    They need the issue and they need to APPEAR to be doing something about it. They WILL, however, try to make a buck off of it, both in terms of campaign contributions and in finding ways to tax anything and everything associated with firearm ownership.

    Sadly it's very easy to fire up a base that is clueless.
     

    MigraineMan

    Defenestration Specialist
    Jun 9, 2011
    19,440
    Frederick County
    Reading the "Handgun Trigger Safety Act" text, I'll make couple of observations.

    First up - The Director of the National Institute of Justice (/me wonders if he wears a cape and a mask to work,) is chartered with issuing grants to qualified businesses to develop "personalized handgun" tech. He's got a $2M budget to issue in 2016, and another $2M in 2017 ... which is a pretty damned small amount for the scope of the product development they're requiring. Regardless of whether or not a successful tech is developed, the prohibitions apply in 2020. So if a viable technology isn't developed, all handgun sales become prohibited. Neato.

    There's a requirement that handgun manufacturers accept firearms they manufactured, at an owner's request, and install the aforementioned personalizing tech. I can't imagine the engineering nightmare of trying to integrate something like this into hundreds or thousands of legacy products.

    And then there's this little gem:
    COST OF RETROFITTING
    (1) COST BORNE BY MANUFACTURERS—
    Upon the request of the owner of a handgun that was manufactured in the United States and that is not a personalized handgun or retrofitted personalized handgun, the manufacturer of the handgun—
    (A) shall—
    (i) retrofit the handgun so that the handgun is a retrofitted personalized hand-gun; and
    (ii) return the handgun to the owner within a reasonable period of time; and
    (B) may not request compensation for the retrofit from the owner

    There's a section a little further on that says manufacturers may be reimbursed for costs for retrofitting handguns. Reimbursements will come from the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund. (I wonder if DOJ knows about this.) No mention of costs that manufacturers will bear engineering the modifications in the first place. And what happens if a manufacturer isn't in business any more?

    This bill is a horribly thought out piece of crap. (Or possibly not, if the purpose is to prohibit handgun sales and to make current owners criminals for non-compliance (e.g. "attempted sale of a non-retrofitted handgun after 2020."))
     

    john_bud

    Ultimate Member
    Sep 23, 2009
    2,045
    Was this from "the Onion" or what?

    Anyway, I've got a 1798 whitney us military rifle that could use a smarter trigger.
     

    Jim12

    Let Freedom Ring
    MDS Supporter
    Jan 30, 2013
    34,315
    Keep in mind that liberals have no real interest in outlawing gun sales. If they succeeded it would be like a dog finally catching a car it was chasing. They wouldn't know what to do politically.

    They need the issue and they need to APPEAR to be doing something about it. They WILL, however, try to make a buck off of it, both in terms of campaign contributions and in finding ways to tax anything and everything associated with firearm ownership.

    Sadly it's very easy to fire up a base that is clueless.

    Sounds like the same strategy by Liberals/ the Left over the past 50 years with respect to:
    poverty
    crime
    drugs
    racism
    health care

    and now,

    ISIS

    The Left has answers for everything, but solutions for nothing.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    276,007
    Messages
    7,304,314
    Members
    33,558
    Latest member
    Charles of the Manor

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom