DC Public Transportation Carry Ban Lawsuit

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Ismee

    Active Member
    Jan 6, 2018
    151
    56
    Oct 5, 2023
    Main Doc
    Notice of Supplemental Authority

    Still no news worth printing! Seems like the court went from foot dragging to knuckle dragging.

    56 notice Notice of Supplemental Authority Thu 10/05 4:42 PM
    NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by GREGORY T. ANGELO, CAMERON M. ERICKSON, ROBERT M. MILLER, TYLER YZAGUIRRE(Lyon, George)
    Att: 1 Exhibit Kipke v. Moore
     
    Last edited:

    Ismee

    Active Member
    Jan 6, 2018
    151
    more "not news"

    Friday, October 06, 2023
    57 notice Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance Fri 10/06 2:07 PM
    NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to GREGORY T. ANGELO, CAMERON M. ERICKSON, ROBERT M. MILLER, TYLER YZAGUIRRE. Attorney Dennis Polio terminated. (Polio, Dennis)

     

    Sunrise

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 18, 2020
    5,181
    Capital Region
    more "not news"

    Friday, October 06, 2023
    57 notice Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance Fri 10/06 2:07 PM
    NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE as to GREGORY T. ANGELO, CAMERON M. ERICKSON, ROBERT M. MILLER, TYLER YZAGUIRRE. Attorney Dennis Polio terminated. (Polio, Dennis)
    Thanks for sharing this.
     

    Bob A

    όυ φροντισ
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 11, 2009
    31,000
    How about that:


    They’re finally making the connection.

    However, they’ll never admit that legal carriers aren’t the crime problem on Metro.

    Neither will they admit that the people who jump the gates,costing the system tens of millions of dollars per year, are also the people whose presence and behavior deters many of the law-abiding from using the system at all.
     

    Afrikeber

    Ultimate Member
    Jan 14, 2013
    6,739
    Urbana, Md.
    Neither will they admit that the people who jump the gates,costing the system tens of millions of dollars per year, are also the people whose presence and behavior deters many of the law-abiding from using the system at all.
    Metro police arrests are up exponentially for gate hoppers. PG and Northern Virginia primarily. Montgomery County no arrests.
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,489
    Westminster USA
    Mo Co no arrests? Why ride the train with the hoi polloi when you can drive by yourself in your Lexus?
     
    Last edited:

    Bob A

    όυ φροντισ
    MDS Supporter
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 11, 2009
    31,000
    Mo Co no arrests? Why ride the train with the hoi polloi when you can drive by yourself in your Lexus?
    Glad you understand.

    Certainly has nothing to do with your decision to abandon MoCo, hoi polloi and all. Me, I'll stick to my 22 yr old ride, as well. Meanwhile, our rulers continue to work hard to turn this into the "Land of Peasant Living."
     

    rascal

    Ultimate Member
    Feb 15, 2013
    1,253
    DC has over the years seized hundreds and hundreds of illegal firearms with pat downs of fair evaders. They no longer do this because they no longer do anything about fair jumpers.. So not only is rampant increased fair evasion costing DC taxpayers billions -- seizing firearms in subway, a formerly major source of getting illegal guns off the streets, has dropped to near nil.

    The irony is a person with no license to carry, and no registration is now at no more risk of being caught or penalized for going on metro rail or bus -- than they do walking down the street illegally armed. There is no legal difference nor increased jeopardy nor increased penalty for a bad guy to be on a subway while armed compared to being on the street while armed. Yet a background checked, trained, waiting period subjected licensed CCPL holder is under way more penalty risk if they are on a subway carrying compared to walking on the street.
     

    Kanly

    Active Member
    Feb 15, 2012
    267
    Washington, DC
    DC has over the years seized hundreds and hundreds of illegal firearms with pat downs of fair evaders. They no longer do this because they no longer do anything about fair jumpers.. So not only is rampant increased fair evasion costing DC taxpayers billions -- seizing firearms in subway, a formerly major source of getting illegal guns off the streets, has dropped to near nil.

    The irony is a person with no license to carry, and no registration is now at no more risk of being caught or penalized for going on metro rail or bus -- than they do walking down the street illegally armed. There is no legal difference nor increased jeopardy nor increased penalty for a bad guy to be on a subway while armed compared to being on the street while armed. Yet a background checked, trained, waiting period subjected licensed CCPL holder is under way more penalty risk if they are on a subway carrying compared to walking on the street.
    Can't argue with anything said here and I'd only add that I'm pretty sure any law abiding DC permit holder would get the book thrown at them for any infraction -- way more than the people with multiple arrests and felony convictions.
     

    Sunrise

    Ultimate Member
    Aug 18, 2020
    5,181
    Capital Region
    sooo, one enumerated right is not as enumerated as another. Gotcha. effing moronic bastage
    In spite of Bruen, it appears so.


    The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780 (plurality opinion). We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need. That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense.

    New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourth Amendment in that it prevents law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for further profeedings consistent with this opinion.
     
    Last edited:

    Ismee

    Active Member
    Jan 6, 2018
    151
    more filings and still no action...

    Mon 12/11 9:03 PM

    NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by GREGORY T. ANGELO, CAMERON M. ERICKSON, ROBERT M. MILLER, TYLER YZAGUIRRE(Lyon, George)
    Att: 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, Antonyuk opinion,
    Att: 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, Springer opinion
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,603
    Messages
    7,288,054
    Members
    33,487
    Latest member
    Mikeymike88

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom