Its crazy that I'm already certified to carry while on duty and have to go through all that...guess i'll talk to a few people and see if they have any blanket reports
Ive been wondering the same thing. Federal Correctional officers are covered under LEOSA and can carry concealed but state Correctional officers can't. MD correctional officers qualify per COMAR standards and must qualify every year. If I'm not mistaken, its the same course of fire that MSP does...just different weapons. I think its rediculous that Correctional officers are good enough to carry a weapon while transporting inmates etc, but once off duty are no longer worthy. COs are threatened on a daily basis...threats can be easily carried out because inmates have contact with friends and family on the outside. Many people fail to realize that. Being a weapons qualified CO should be Good and Substantial enough but its not >
Ive been wondering the same thing. Federal Correctional officers are covered under LEOSA and can carry concealed but state Correctional officers can't. MD correctional officers qualify per COMAR standards and must qualify every year. If I'm not mistaken, its the same course of fire that MSP does...just different weapons. I think its rediculous that Correctional officers are good enough to carry a weapon while transporting inmates etc, but once off duty are no longer worthy. COs are threatened on a daily basis...threats can be easily carried out because inmates have contact with friends and family on the outside. Many people fail to realize that. Being a weapons qualified CO should be Good and Substantial enough but its not >
+1Being a citizen should be enough.
Trust me, I wish Maryland would issue to everyone. I don't have any more right than anyone else to want to protect myself and my loved ones.
And thank you boundless, it's really nothing more than being an adult babysitter as I'm sure you know.
As a police officer, I never understood why COs had to jump through hoops just to carry off duty.
They likely get threatened by folks ready and willing to follow up on said threats, and they likely fight more in a month than I did in 30 years.
Cops deal with A-Holes, but COs are locked in with and deal with highly concentrated A-Holes.
As a police officer, I never understood why COs had to jump through hoops just to carry off duty.
They likely get threatened by folks ready and willing to follow up on said threats, and they likely fight more in a month than I did in 30 years.
Cops deal with A-Holes, but COs are locked in with and deal with highly concentrated A-Holes.
Boundlessdyad I have always been an advocate for citizens of EVERY state to be able to carry concealed and will always support what I believe to be a natural right to defend ones self, family and property by any means necessarry. rseymorejr I TOTALLY agree with you that being a citizen is a Good and Substanital reason to carry...I was directing it more towards the fact that State Police and Federal Correctional officers can carry concealed because they are "trained" and "qualified" yet COs who have the same weapons training are only considered "trained" and "qualified" while on the clock. I moved to Maryland from WV a few years ago for mainly work purposes...by far the largest mistake I have made in my life. We are doing some upgrades to our house so we can put it on the market in hopes of selling it and moving back to a FREE state.
Federal Correctional officers are covered under LEOSA and can carry concealed but state Correctional officers can't.
With reference to the country as a whole, that is not accurate. A correctional officer employed by an agency of a state or county is covered by the federal Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (18 USC Sec. 926b and 926c) if he meets the requirements set forth in the federal law, as follows:
(c) As used in this section, the term “qualified law enforcement officer” means an employee of a governmental agency who—
(1) is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of, or the incarceration of any person for, any violation of law, and has statutory powers of arrest or apprehension under section 807 (b) of title 10, United States Code (article 7(b) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice);
(2) is authorized by the agency to carry a firearm;
(3) is not the subject of any disciplinary action by the agency which could result in suspension or loss of police powers;
(4) meets standards, if any, established by the agency which require the employee to regularly qualify in the use of a firearm;
(5) is not under the influence of alcohol or another intoxicating or hallucinatory drug or substance; and
(6) is not prohibited by Federal law from receiving a firearm.
I looked into this issue several years ago when I was writing an article on LEOSA, and as I recall, the state correctional officers in some states did meet these criteria. However, I do not know whether correctional officers in Maryland meet all of the criteria -- for example, are there any circumstances under which a Maryland correctional officers "has statutory powers of arrest"? (Ignore the phrase that begins with "or apprehension . . .," which was added recently to cover certain military police officers. For everybody else, the standard is "statutory powers of arrest.")
If a correctional officer fulfills the federal requirements, then he can exercise the privilege spelled out in the federal law, in any jurisdiction -- his home state and his employer really have nothing to say about it, in my opinion. I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
The question of whether a given officer qualifies under LEOSA is, of course, entirely separate and distinct from the question of whether he would be deemed to qualify for a Maryland state carry permit.