ATF looking to reclassify projectiles

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,493
    Westminster USA
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​

    CCRKBA Letter To BATF Chief Blasts Proposed Ammo Ban


    [FONT=&quot]BELLEVUE, WA – The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms has sent a blistering letter to B. Todd Jones, director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, opposing the Obama administration’s proposed ban on M855 ammunition for modern sport-utility rifles.[/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot]CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb told Jones in the letter that after hearing from thousands of members, he cannot blame them for being “concerned” and “furious” over the proposal, first made public on Feb. 13. If adopted, the ban would affect perhaps the most popular commercially-available ammunition for modern semi-auto rifles owned by millions of American citizens. A copy of the letter may be read here.[/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot]“The ammunition in question, M855 ball for the 5.56mm/.223 Remington modern sport-utility rifle, provides an affordable option for AR-15 owners to practice, compete, hunt varmints and control predators,” Gottlieb wrote. “The argument that there is no ‘sporting purpose’ for this ammunition is at best specious. It is the most popular ammunition for the most popular rifle in America today.[/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot]“There does not appear to have ever been a single use of this ammunition in one of the handguns chambered for the .223 Remington to injure or kill a law enforcement officer wearing soft body armor,” he added. “This proposed ban on the M855 seems like an answer to a problem that does not exist.”[/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot]Gottlieb cautioned Jones that CCRKBA members “are seriously concerned that such an administrative maneuver could easily be used again to ban other types of common rifle ammunition, all of which we both know is capable of penetrating Kevlar and similar bullet resistant vests, which were designed to stop handgun bullets.” He assured Jones that CCRKBA members “have a long tradition of support for law enforcement.”[/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot]“However,” he concluded, “I must concur with those members that the proposal appears to be a camel’s-nose-under-the-tent effort that, if successful, could easily be abused to place even more restrictions on other rifle ammunition in the future.”[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot]With more than 650,000 members and supporters nationwide, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is one of the nation’s premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, the Citizens Committee is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States. The Citizens Committee can be reached by phone at (425) 454-4911, on the Internet at www.ccrkba.org or by email to InformationRequest@ccrkba.org.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    <Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family>​
    Copyright © 2015 Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, All Rights Reserved.​
    [FONT=&quot]Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
    James Madison Building
    12500 N.E. Tenth Place
    Bellevue, WA 98005[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Voice: 425-454-4911
    Toll Free: 800-426-4302
    FAX: 425-451-3959
    Email: InformationRequest@ccrkba.org[/FONT]​

    ...
     

    rbird7282

    Ultimate Member
    MDS Supporter
    Dec 6, 2012
    18,739
    Columbia
    Comment period is open until March 16 so nothing until after that


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     

    Evojoeix

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 2, 2014
    1,292
    i find it interesting how many people are up in arms over this, but yet when they released the letter about the sig brace, people just sat back and say "well we knew it was coming".....
     

    swinokur

    In a State of Bliss
    Patriot Picket
    Apr 15, 2009
    55,493
    Westminster USA
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​

    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]SAF Authorizes Court Action If .223[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Ammo Ban Is Implemented[/FONT]

    [FONT=&quot][/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]BELLEVUE, WA – The Second Amendment Foundation has authorized court action if the proposed ban on .223-caliber ammunition is implemented by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the foundation’s general counsel has warned in a letter to BATFE Director B. Todd Jones.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Writing for SAF, general counsel Miko Tempski tells Jones, “This proposal is just an attempt to limit firearms rights because the President’s other such attempts have been blocked through constitutional checks and balances on his power.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]“Should the BATFE lawlessly proceed on this path,” Tempski warns, “SAF intends to call on those checks and balances to stop the Administration’s executive overreach again.”[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Tempski’s three-page letter dissects the BATFE proposal, noting repeatedly that M855 ammunition at the center of this controversy “is not armor piercing pursuant to the definition in the statute.” The federal provisions requires that a cartridge fire a “full jacketed projectile large than .22-caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun…,” or to otherwise be fit for use in a handgun and have a core “entirely constructed” form a specific list of non-lead metals to be prohibited.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Tempski explained that the M855 round does not meet either of these criteria. He said the first definition, “fails immediately as the 5.56 x 45 mm round is not designed and intended for use in a handgun,” and he questioned the ATF’s honesty with regard to the second definition, noting that a “small tip of steel making up less than 1/6th of the projectile cannot be used to claim the bullet or its core are “entirely” steel.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]“The proposed framework,” he writes, “intends to define the intended purpose of ammunition based on the availability of certain types of handguns made for it. Such a circular definition is highly illogical in any context.”[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]The comment period remains open through March 16. People may submit comments to:[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Email[/FONT][FONT=&quot]: APAComments@atf.gov [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Fax[/FONT][FONT=&quot]: (202) 648-9741.[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Mail[/FONT][FONT=&quot]: Denise Brown, Mailstop 6N-602, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Enforcement Programs and Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20226: ATTN: AP Ammo Comments.[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]


    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]The Second Amendment Foundation ([/FONT][FONT=&quot]www.saf.org[/FONT][FONT=&quot] ) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.[/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot]
    [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    [FONT=&quot]< Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >[/FONT][FONT=&quot] [/FONT]​
    Copyright © 2014 Second Amendment Foundation, All Rights Reserved.​
    [FONT=&quot]Second Amendment Foundation
    James Madison Building
    12500 N.E. Tenth Place
    Bellevue, WA 98005[/FONT]
    [FONT=&quot]Voice: 425-454-7012
    Toll Free: 800-426-4302
    FAX: 425-451-3959
    email: InformationRequest@saf.org[/FONT]​

    ...




    [FONT=&quot][/FONT]
     

    CypherPunk

    Opinions Are My Own
    Apr 6, 2012
    3,907

    fidelity

    piled higher and deeper
    MDS Supporter
    Aug 15, 2012
    22,400
    Frederick County
    Good to know. The NRA alert and the Congressional letter doesn't identify the party affiliation of the 238 signatories, so am curious how many are Democrats. Irrespective, this level of Congressional interest (over 50% of House members) should get ATF's attention.
     

    j_h_smith

    Ultimate Member
    Jul 28, 2007
    28,516
    I read about this last week. I think everyone can agree this is a non-issue. But Obama is going to try anyway he can to do as much damage to the 2A while still in office.

    Jim Smith
     

    BinaryBoris

    On YouTube: "NotAGunGuy"
    Jan 6, 2015
    92
    Unfortunately it looks like the ATF already removed the exemption in their regulation guide as of January:

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...ned-common-at15-green-tip-ammunition-n1966761

    It also doesn't bode well that when asked about the ATF decision, White House spokesman Josh Earnest referred to it as a "common sense" solution. Note that when Obama announced his executive actions on gun control after the failed 2013 legislation, he promised "common sense" solutions.

    I hope Congress does get together some kind of bill, but remember that even if it passes Congress you can be sure Obama will veto it immediately.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Latest posts

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,643
    Messages
    7,289,617
    Members
    33,493
    Latest member
    dracula

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom