When newspapers were worth their ink this is the kind of investigation they used to do
Voter fraud in Maryland?
- Thread starter teratos
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
When newspapers were worth their ink this is the kind of investigation they used to do
whistlersmother
Peace through strength
If they win the lawsuit, will the plantiffs ask for voter ID as a relief?
Maybe a new tactic to get voter ID in those ... uh ...creative corrupt states.
Maybe a new tactic to get voter ID in those ... uh ...
-Z/28-
I wanna go fast
Hmm if they win could they ask for an audit/recount of the election eliminating votes of non citizens?
Motor voter at the DMV is the problem. The DMV fills the form for you.
ROBAR35
Living the farm life
It will if Hogan looses by 200 votes
- Dec 27, 2012
- 30,215
Ellen Sauerbrey lost to Parris Glendening in 1994 by 6,000 votes.
5.56blaster
Ultimate Member
Are you $hiting Me? In Maryland. Dems vote early and often!!
You think it helps?
Could be the straw that breaks the camels back BUT would that REALLY be a bad thing to you?Kudos to her and I mean that, but does she vote illegally? and when is she going to become a citizen? I'm all for naturalizing productive members of society. Some of my friends and relatives have gone through the process. They are now voters and were taxpayers from the beginning.
Let's not bash all immigrants, some of them are great people despite the democrats.
I disagree about early voting. I see that as a way of making voting more convenient for everyone and reducing the lines on election day. I took advantage of that tonight. Where I agree with you is on the voter identification. That's ridiculous and should be fixed everywhere. Where that's failed is the supposed burden it places on the poor. The way to fix that is to provide for low income, otherwise eligible people to get a voting ID at literally no cost - including transportation, having to take time off work, gathering required documents like birth certificates, etc. That'll kill the court challenges. And I'm going to add the current implementation of electronic voting to your list. No accountability, no verification; that's just begging for fraud.
altima98
Active Member
- Apr 6, 2008
- 629
Reptile
Ultimate Member
And curiously enough those votes were "found" in a box in a locked classroom long after the polls had closed.
I'll add mine...
Mr H
Banana'd
Attachments
Even if you require ID, the combination of the driver's license bonanza for noncitizens and Motor Voter registration makes that whole requirement a joke. On us.
How would anyone know? Get real. Maryland is the new Chicago.
You can't tie them to specific votes, but you can certainly challenge the integrity of the election itself in court if the number of ineligible people who showed up to vote is larger than the difference in votes in any particular race. What kind of relief can you then gain? Maybe get the results tossed and a special election called, at which point only your die-hards actually show up to be heard.
All of this only actually matters if the results are fairly close and the traceable, provably ineligible voter count is fairly high. That said, Maryland is one of few places where you might actually see both of those at once.
