Lane Decision. Held: No standing

The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast

Member Benefits:

  • No ad networks!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Opinion attached. Note this was argued the day before Woollard to a different panel of judges.
     

    Attachments

    • opinion.Lane.pdf
      41.5 KB · Views: 501

    krucam

    Ultimate Member
    No injury due to Mr Syke's being able to set up his FFL in DC at the Metro PD building. This all happened after the case was filed in District.

    Yes, DC mooted this one into a case without Injury, ergo no Standing...

    Sucks, this one was a well-intentioned case with good potential until DC mooted it.
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,921
    WV
    No injury due to Mr Syke's being able to set up his FFL in DC at the Metro PD building. This all happened after the case was filed in District.

    Yes, DC mooted this one into a case without Injury, ergo no Standing...

    Sucks, this one was a well-intentioned case with good potential until DC mooted it.

    I still think its BS that DC residents have to pay $125 transfer fee, or the fact that rifles can be purchased across state lines but not handguns.
    However those issues are not low hanging fruit at this time and it'll be an uphill battle. This will be a fight for another day.
     

    EL1227

    R.I.P.
    Patriot Picket
    Nov 14, 2010
    20,274
    No injury due to Mr Syke's being able to set up his FFL in DC at the Metro PD building. This all happened after the case was filed in District.

    Yes, DC mooted this one into a case without Injury, ergo no Standing...

    Sucks, this one was a well-intentioned case with good potential until DC mooted it.

    Wanna bet that Mr. Sykes' District-sponsored FFL location will go the way of budget cuts or some other lame excuse to do away with the only legitimate way to import a handgun into DC now that the case has been mooted ?

    I wonder what Emily Miller will have to say about it since she had many words regarding 'the process' in her series ?
     

    press1280

    Ultimate Member
    Jun 11, 2010
    7,921
    WV
    Wanna bet that Mr. Sykes' District-sponsored FFL location will go the way of budget cuts or some other lame excuse to do away with the only legitimate way to import a handgun into DC now that the case has been mooted ?

    I wonder what Emily Miller will have to say about it since she had many words to say about 'the process' in her series ?

    Oh no they won't. The $125 dollar fee plus all of DC's burdensome regulations are enough of a deterrent to keep legal gun owners at a minimum.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    No. And actually I do beleive the district can file for fees against the plaintiffs.

    They could but would almost certainly not get them. 1983 fees, while supposedly available to all prevailing parties, in reality are only awarded to prevailing plaintiffs, not defendants. Lots of precedent on this.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    Petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed today. REads well, but I don't have a lot of hope for this one. No dissent.
     

    Attachments

    • Lane.PetitionForRehearingEnBanc.pdf
      1.8 MB · Views: 207

    Les Gawlik

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 2, 2009
    3,384
    I think this could easily have gone either way on the standing issue. I read the opinion as saying "condoms, cars and chardonnay good, guns bad." I think the distinctions in the cases they cited are specious.
     

    esqappellate

    President, MSI
    Feb 12, 2012
    7,408
    I think this could easily have gone either way on the standing issue. I read the opinion as saying "condoms, cars and chardonnay good, guns bad." I think the distinctions in the cases they cited are specious.

    I agree with Gura on this. The standing holding is egregiously wrong.
     

    Les Gawlik

    Ultimate Member
    Apr 2, 2009
    3,384
    These decisions are not just bad, they are outrageously bad. However, like the IRS scandal, the AP scandal and the Benghazi scandal, each is evidence that we have a government of personal whim, and not a government of law. Too bad we lost (or perhaps, optimistically, "misplaced") the things that made America great.
     

    Fox123

    Ultimate Member
    May 21, 2012
    3,931
    Rosedale, MD
    Preview of the case that is currently filed here in MD? Now that MSP has sent their letter out, mooting any standing that MSI and The dealers association has?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    275,740
    Messages
    7,293,733
    Members
    33,507
    Latest member
    Davech1831

    Latest threads

    Top Bottom