esqappellate
President, MSI
- Feb 12, 2012
- 7,408
Got my Postal return receipt of my appeal to the Handgun Permit Review Board of my post stay Non-processed denial.
Please let us know ASAP what happens at the Board.
Got my Postal return receipt of my appeal to the Handgun Permit Review Board of my post stay Non-processed denial.
Please let us know ASAPwhat happens at the Boardwhen the board denies you a hearing because you were not denied your permit.
Is the review board part of MSP? If so are they part of the permit section? Just trying to get an idea if they know how this is being handle and if they are expecting to get a lot of these returned.
Is the review board part of MSP? If so are they part of the permit section? Just trying to get an idea if they know how this is being handle and if they are expecting to get a lot of these returned.
The Governor appoints the Board's five members from the general public to three-year terms with Senate advice and consent (Article 27, §36E).
Got my Postal return receipt of my appeal to the Handgun Permit Review Board of my post stay Non-processed denial.
Please let us know ASAPwhat happens at the Boardwhen the board denies you a hearing because you were not denied your permit.
Fixed that for you.
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=maryland+handgun+permit+review+board&l=1
Just kidding with the link, btw, in a humorous mood this morning. From the end result of that link:
From that, I assumed they were created as an civilian oversight program, outside of the direct control of the MSP but acting as agents of the Governor.
So...
Does that mean he is now logically "Not Disapproved"?!
So, let's see:
The Governor appoints the five board members.
Let's assume that the Governor supports gun control.
What way do you think the board members would lean on an issue?
So, let's see:
The Governor appoints the five board members.
Let's assume that the Governor supports gun control.
What way do you think the board members would lean on an issue?
Because it would screw up their "statistics"? We almost WANTED that, and were encouraged to apply for EXACTLY that reason. I don't think we saw THIS coming.
We all know the "statistics" were nothing more than a sham... a sleight-of-hand to prevent people from peeking behind the curtain to see the real issue...
They simply do not want people to apply for--and especially not to get--permits.
Oh WE know that....but they were hinging on it, so to destroy it would be beautiful.
Already done in by their actions. The letters remove credibility that their affirmation rate has any meaning. No logical review of their process would survive even minimal scrutiny.
They abandoned the high-approval rate claim.
Yes they do, it was on CSI and therefore must be true.
Honestly, to my simple mind, it would seem smart if they did carry a round that was not going to T&T a perp and then penetrate the aircraft as well.
Thread drift, sorry. Now back to our regularly scheduled program.
FWIW, we expect to see some more games if a special session is called. We're ready.
Already done in by their actions. The letters remove credibility that their affirmation rate has any meaning. No logical review of their process would survive even minimal scrutiny.
They abandoned the high-approval rate claim.
Just playing devils advocate for a second....
"But we didn't deny any permits, we MERELY told them that it would be LIKELY to be denied, and out of the goodness of our hearts we returned the application and money so they could reapply with a better reason (whereupon we would studiously investigate and execute the application). We didn't have to, we just wanted to save the citizens their money in these hard economic times. Since we didn't actually process the application or cash the check we did not TECHNICALLY deny the application, ergo we still have a 97% permit approval rate."
[/DA]
See what I mean? It's not logical or legal, but it could give insight into their twisted little minds.