KevinK
Ultimate Member
See something, say something.
As Lt. Kinderman said in The Exorcist: "If certain British doctors never asked "What is this fungus?" we wouldn't today have penicillin, correct?"
The #1 community for Gun Owners of the Northeast
Member Benefits:
No ad networks! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
See something, say something.
As Lt. Kinderman said in The Exorcist: "If certain British doctors never asked "What is this fungus?" we wouldn't today have penicillin, correct?"
yep, let the mods or Norton sort it out
Someone has mentioned before that MDSP is also on here too. Not sure who they are though.
MDSP, if they are here, doesn't draw attention to themselves with obviously bogus posts designed to get to the classifieds or WC.
They are smarter than that.
They are smarter than that.
redeemed.man
Ultimate Member
No, but they do pay attention when people (mostly newbies) post ridiculous legal questions and our membership answers them in ways that conflict with the law...
true that
Good!
Those consecutive out of context posts are weird. It's as if there's some sort of internet bot posting.
Anyway, the post count is dropping so someone's working on it.
It's not a bot. It's just someone who isn't interested in contributing to the community, just either spying or wanting to sell something.
- Feb 19, 2013
- 18,781
Got to be door #2 because the previous choice is a snoozer.
i agree, but for a different reason. Spying normally involves not getting noticed.
Good luck. I will be submitting my application soon. Any tips on the mandatory law class we have to take? Should I take it before or after I submit the application?
Was there anyone else applying while you were there?
I got the nice lady to smile! How about you? They seemed rather pleasant to deal with to me.
Like many LEO's, I don't think they care about carry one way or the other.. If they do they keep it professional.
It's their political bosses who don't want to comply with the Constitution.
Too f'in bad. Thank you President Trump.
It's their political bosses who don't want to comply with the Constitution.
Too f'in bad. Thank you President Trump.
teqmod
redneck gun toting member
With regards to this case it was my understanding that DC had 90 days to submit to the supreme court. With today being the 25th we are either almost there or are there, does anyone know if this was done or are they accepting the decision now?
they caved weeks ago
https://oag.dc.gov/release/attorney...ot-appeal-wrenn-v-dc-and-grace-v-dc-gun-cases
.
https://oag.dc.gov/release/attorney...ot-appeal-wrenn-v-dc-and-grace-v-dc-gun-cases
.
shacklefordbanks
Active Member
- Mar 27, 2013
- 252
Ok, I'm still concerned by mixed guidance being given by DC about carry in restaurants that serve alcohol.
I know that the law's details have been posted here before apparently showing it was OK to carry in a restaurant as long as you where not drinking, but the posted FAQ bluntly states "On premises where alcohol is served".
This could lead to problems with the public and police not knowing the law and needlessly harassing people.
From the FAQ:
Q: Can those who do hold a concealed-carry permit in the District carry them anywhere in the
city, at any time?
A: No. Similar to the time, place, and manner restrictions on the exercise of First Amendment
rights, there are certain limitations on the times and places where a permit holder may carry a
concealed handgun in the District. Permit holders cannot carry their handguns:
• While they are consuming alcohol or are otherwise impaired;
• In a District government building;
• On the grounds of childcare facility, public or private school or university;
• At a hospital or medical/mental health office;
• At a penal institute, secure juvenile facility, or halfway house;
• At a polling place while voting is occurring;
• On public transportation, including in Metro stations;
• On premises where alcohol is served;
• At a stadium or arena;
• At a gathering or special event open to the public;
<SNIP>
I know that the law's details have been posted here before apparently showing it was OK to carry in a restaurant as long as you where not drinking, but the posted FAQ bluntly states "On premises where alcohol is served".
This could lead to problems with the public and police not knowing the law and needlessly harassing people.
From the FAQ:
Q: Can those who do hold a concealed-carry permit in the District carry them anywhere in the
city, at any time?
A: No. Similar to the time, place, and manner restrictions on the exercise of First Amendment
rights, there are certain limitations on the times and places where a permit holder may carry a
concealed handgun in the District. Permit holders cannot carry their handguns:
• While they are consuming alcohol or are otherwise impaired;
• In a District government building;
• On the grounds of childcare facility, public or private school or university;
• At a hospital or medical/mental health office;
• At a penal institute, secure juvenile facility, or halfway house;
• At a polling place while voting is occurring;
• On public transportation, including in Metro stations;
• On premises where alcohol is served;
• At a stadium or arena;
• At a gathering or special event open to the public;
<SNIP>
A FAQ probably written by someone else in the AG office is neither an AG opinion or the law.
The original Act said on premises was prohibited, but was changed. It seems like some of these folks don't know what their own statute says
I will have zero issues carrying in a legally allowed location.
DC Code
§ 7-2509.07.
Prohibited:
The original Act said on premises was prohibited, but was changed. It seems like some of these folks don't know what their own statute says
I will have zero issues carrying in a legally allowed location.
DC Code
§ 7-2509.07.
Prohibited:
