Winner Shoots Dog

[smokering]

http://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2013/07/29/pasadena-man-shoots-kills-girlfriends-newly-adopted-dog/

Guess she was lucky she didn't get in the way............

 

[Mr H]

Ah, good old Pasatucky.......

July 27, 2013, at approximately 9:22 p.m.

I'd guess there may have been adult beverages involved.

 

[Scooter]

REALLY? Because the dog "nipped" at him? What a pansy! I hope he truly gets what is coming to him!

 

[44man]

as i have said before i like dogs better than people and i would say this dog was protecting its owner when it was killed.

if this guy were to get a round thru the back of his head i would say all would be even. there is no excuse for animal cruelty.

 

[g_mars]

as i have said before i like dogs better than people and i would say this dog was protecting its owner when it was killed.

if this guy were to get a round thru the back of his head i would say all would be even. there is no excuse for animal cruelty.

Amen.

 

[WeaponsCollector]

Only the police and military should shoot dogs.

 

[44man]

Only the police and military should shoot dogs.

personaly i believe shooting a dog should be the same crime as shooting a person. when its justified to save life then i see it as ok. other than that it should be a crime. for the public, police or the miltary alike.

 

[Mr H]

Only the police and military should shoot dogs.

In dog parks.

 

[K.C.Dean]

He will lose his 2A rights because a dog nipped at him. He definitely didn't think before he shot the dog. Stupid!

 

[Mr H]

Assuming, of course, he owned it legally in the first place.

 

[fleaman64]

as i have said before i like dogs better than people and i would say this dog was protecting its owner when it was killed.

if this guy were to get a round thru the back of his head i would say all would be even. there is no excuse for animal cruelty.

Yeah, even when cops do it...too much of this sh*t goin' on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqzmm9TRTXc

 

[fleaman64]

Only the police and military should shoot dogs.

Really? Under what circumstances?

 

[planktonadbc]

Only the police and military should shoot dogs.

Hopefully with good reason and investigation. The mayor of Berwyn Heights was caught in an incident a few years ago, things when terribly wrong. PG go in gang busters shoot first ask questions later. Met Calvo in 2006, any gumshoe should have figured this out. PG attitude is they would have stormed the White House and then say, oh potus lives here? Duhhh
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/...1_police-dog-trinity-tomsic-mayor-cheye-calvo

 

[rwbow1969]

personaly i believe shooting a dog should be the same crime as shooting a person. when its justified to save life then i see it as ok. other than that it should be a crime. for the public, police or the miltary alike.

That's pretty far fetched. I like dogs but, really same as a person.

 

[mbz300sdl]

That's pretty far fetched. I like dogs but, really same as a person.

This it is still property and yes I like and grew up owning dogs

 

[Boom Boom]

as i have said before i like dogs better than people and i would say this dog was protecting its owner when it was killed.

if this guy were to get a round thru the back of his head i would say all would be even. there is no excuse for animal cruelty.

Dogs are a way better judge of people than people. I agree about the dog protecting its owner. Dude needs to see the inside of a prison cell for a long time.

 

[hvymax]

I value dogs more than most people.

 

[dragonfire1911]

Cruelty to animals correlate well with future sociopath crimes. This dog lost his life but may save others from this sick POS in the future. The girlfriend should be glad she found out before her life is in danger.

 

[Boom Boom]

I value dogs more than most people.

We you anyway.

 

[Moon]

Really? Under what circumstances?

He was being sarcastic, though more than a few badge bunnies would agree.