Second Amendment
Ultimate Member
- May 11, 2011
- 8,665
My vote would be for the CZ.
It's interesting how many people have pointed to the CZ-75, Tanfoglio (CZ-75 derived), and Jericho (Tanfoglio-derived). Bit of a pattern there, to say the least.My vote would be for the CZ.
CZ 2075 is never mentioned as an option for small 9mm's.
But on paper and in reviews it looks like a good option. I'd like to try one.
Does anyone even own one? Lotta hype for it, but I haven't seen any real reviews by owners.Strike One.
Until 4th page it was kept secret.
Does anyone even own one? Lotta hype for it, but I haven't seen any real reviews by owners.
My sister has one, I've fired it , and it appears to be a "keeper" . That being said, they're hard to find at MSRP .
Brent
I've got two-
1) The FN five-seven - for all the reasons mentored earlier-
I would have loved this. I planned for it for a while. I bought 2000 rds from cheaper than dirt in 2007. I sold them on gunbroker for $2500.00. It made it easier to watch my dreams slip away. Ammo prices are insane now. Otherwise the above assessment is entirely accurate.
It's interesting how many people have pointed to the CZ-75, Tanfoglio (CZ-75 derived), and Jericho (Tanfoglio-derived). Bit of a pattern there, to say the least.
I have a sweet 1963 production East German Makarov. It shoots better than my Glock and feels solid in you hand.
Any comments on the trigger compared to Sigs (since both are DA/SA)? Or other comparisons?
It's interesting how many people have pointed to the CZ-75, Tanfoglio (CZ-75 derived), and Jericho (Tanfoglio-derived). Bit of a pattern there, to say the least.
One other shout-out is to the Beretta 70 series. Superb firearms, but I believe there were import issues with getting them in the USA.