TxAggie
Ultimate Member
Lesson One: Don't squat on land unless you have a deed.
No, no, no.
Lesson 1 is Don't squat WITH YOUR SPURS ON!!!
(Ouch!)
Lesson One: Don't squat on land unless you have a deed.
You all know we are fvcked here, right? The intent of our country was SPELLED OUT that the government is supposed to fear the people. However, as I think most of us agree, the government is pretty much solely interested in continuing to have the power that it does. They will do whatever it takes to keep the people in line.
I'm not saying concentration camps, I'm saying things like monitoring everyone's communications dragnet-style, and paying more attention to the dissenters. "domestic terrorists". Shit, the very idea of terrorism being played up as much as it is! Its orwellian.
So, we see that the Fed AWB sunsets, and the people are not for another. The government decides, "well since we want a docile populace that is squarely under the yolk we placed, it would be easier to keep em in line by letting the loud ones have guns. Its not like they have the armored personnel carriers our sherrifs depts now have, nor fully automatics. A revolution is unlikely."
What this did was show us, them, and the world that if push comes to shove people are willing to stand up to the government. Armed insurrection isn't just a hilarious joke to them now. Combine that with growing numbers of poor, disenfranchised gun owners, more guns being sold now than ever before, a sh!tty and sinking economy, and international tensions, and the US government now has urgency.
They MUST stop gun ownership in this country. This has to be very high on their priorities right now. If they cant do it outright, ban lead smelting (done). Start restricting ammo importation (being done). Attempt mass registration (being proposed). Start trying to use peoples mental health as a quantifier for gun ownership when THEY DRAFT THE QUALIFICATIONS (being done).
They have been picking away idly, shooting for one day. I have a feeling that "one day" just got moved a hell of a lot closer. I think the Bundy ranch will prove to have been very bad for the 2nd ammendment as we know it down the line.
Except that It's no longer just individuals standing up to the Feds, states are now starting to openly defy Federal intervention. They are starting to remember that little thing known as the Tenth Amendment. Between states passing nullification laws, and states like Texas openly telling the Feds to F-off, individuals are feeling more empowered than ever.
I've said it countless times since last spring, most everyone here looks at all of these events through the prism of being from Maryland. That we are doomed to fall into socialism. Once you get away from either coast, what the media deems Fly-over country, the general feel of the communities is much different.
Even after everything the major networks threw at the Newtown story, public opinion nationally is AGAINST more gun control. The media makes it sound like we are in the minority, but I promise you on a national basis we are not.
Yowell won his case against the BLM
http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwo...ase-against-blm-grazing-fees-dismissed-100887
Still, .gov took more than their share
His case was dismissed. Yes he didn't have to pay the $180,000 and stopped the gov. from taking his SS checks. He had to sell all his cattle and is not raising cattle anymore. I believe that if a hadn't been a Native American it would have turned out different. He was suing for millions and like he said" they threw me a bone".
The Bundy situation is'nt over. Time is on the BLM's side and those fees are getting bigger. Mr. Bundy might have an accident then the BLM will go after his estate. I am sure they have a lein against his ranch.
Once one concludes the government is no longer valid (i.e. the official govt violates the very document that gives it validity) there is no longer a moral imperative to follow the laws imposed by that govt.
Rob.
you sound like a damn fool
Lesson: the media and libs will interject race into an issue to dumb it down and deligitimize it.
The media didn't have to. Looks like Bundy did that himself....
http://news.msn.com/us/nevada-rancher-condemned-for-racist-remarks
The media didn't have to. Looks like Bundy did that himself....
http://news.msn.com/us/nevada-rancher-condemned-for-racist-remarks
Now the cause can be distracted away to something else instead of the original issue.
He merely walked straight into the trap.
MSNBC spent an entire segment last week making this a "racism" issue, long before Bundy said a thing.
Yeah, but if they already have a lien then it should end there. That's what everyone else does. Either wait for the ranch to be sold or for him to die and claim the lien.. That's the crux of the whole situation. Any other court rules against the def then the plaintiff gets a lien and that's it. They can also get interest on the amount owed with the lien. So, why the big hurry to reclaim the land by force?
I don't take anything from the New York Slimes as truth. I smell a liberal rat. Bait and switch.
Watch the video. This guy is a dyed-in-the-wool racist.
He merely walked straight into the trap.
MSNBC spent an entire segment last week making this a "racism" issue, long before Bundy said a thing.