pcfixer
Ultimate Member
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Docket..._Weber v. State of Ohio Petition for Cert.pdf
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
What is the proper standard of constitutional review of a law that impacts the core value of the Second Amendment—possession and use of a firearm within
the home?
A. Material Facts.
The case arose when Weber’s wife called 911 at approximately 4:00 am on February 17, 2018. She reported that Weber was in possession of a firearm and
intoxicated. Officers were dispatched to investigate.
When they arrived, Weber’s wife told them “everything
was alright,” and he had put the gun away. App. to Pet.
for Cert. 93a. Officers nonetheless entered the house
and saw Weber holding a shotgun, barrel pointing
downward. Id. He told them the gun was unloaded,
and Officers took it from him without incident. Id.
They confirmed it was not loaded, and there was no
ammunition in sight. Officers observed (and evidence
confirmed) that Weber was intoxicated from alcohol.
App. to Pet. for Cert. 93a-95a.
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
What is the proper standard of constitutional review of a law that impacts the core value of the Second Amendment—possession and use of a firearm within
the home?
A. Material Facts.
The case arose when Weber’s wife called 911 at approximately 4:00 am on February 17, 2018. She reported that Weber was in possession of a firearm and
intoxicated. Officers were dispatched to investigate.
When they arrived, Weber’s wife told them “everything
was alright,” and he had put the gun away. App. to Pet.
for Cert. 93a. Officers nonetheless entered the house
and saw Weber holding a shotgun, barrel pointing
downward. Id. He told them the gun was unloaded,
and Officers took it from him without incident. Id.
They confirmed it was not loaded, and there was no
ammunition in sight. Officers observed (and evidence
confirmed) that Weber was intoxicated from alcohol.
App. to Pet. for Cert. 93a-95a.