Deep Thought
Active Member
So while I don't have a W&C (thanks MD), I had the opportunity to view one recently. One of the restrictions read something like "Not valid where firearms are prohibited." But I note it didn't say "by law".
I'm guessing this is on purpose to create ambiguity? Would then local mere "policy" then have the force of law invalidating a W&C?
Just curious... Have been considering applying (if I can meet the G&S hoops), but this seems an important question as to the usefulness. Sorry if this was discussed elsewhere, I couldn't find it. (And yes I know 'concealed is concealed'... but more interested in the legality not practicality - risk avoider here.)
I'm guessing this is on purpose to create ambiguity? Would then local mere "policy" then have the force of law invalidating a W&C?
Just curious... Have been considering applying (if I can meet the G&S hoops), but this seems an important question as to the usefulness. Sorry if this was discussed elsewhere, I couldn't find it. (And yes I know 'concealed is concealed'... but more interested in the legality not practicality - risk avoider here.)