Regular VP9 with the 4.1" barrel and 15+1 standard capacity is directly comparable in size to CZ P10c. P10s and VP9SK are directly comparable in size as well.Well, you mean the full size VP9? Or the SK. Which is the compact version most resembles the P10c?
After all, HK did make the first polymer and striker fired pistol.
Thats a tough choice. To me the p10c just barely edges out the hk. The vp9 has a little more muzzle flip, can hydro lock when submerged in water and parts and magazines are expensive. When it comes to HK legendary reliability, even HK says their hammer fired guns are the best.
I’m m in the market for another pistol and one of the challenges I’ve had in the past with HKs is spare part, magazine availability/price.
Am I looking in the wrong places? (HK direct and TopGun Supply)
One of the pervasive arguments for glock has been aftermarket support and parts availability. I waited over 3 months for some Sig parts when refurbishing the 229/226 LEO trade ins so I’m not interested in buying into a pistol which will be challenging to maintain and service with parts... these were project pistols not HD or carry options so I could ‘afford’ the delay.
I love my P30 and 45ct and wouldn’t mind another HK. Also like my PPQ, sigs and 1911s but don’t have a sense for mag/part availability for walther, polymer sigs. 1911s shouldn’t be an issue, but maybe the 2011 support will be a little thin...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Yeah it's pretty aggressive. You can knock it down a bit with a few minutes of work though.Does anyone else find the grip texture on the CZ P10C to be overly aggressive?