US v Daniels

[Inigoes]

A pro-marijuana ruling in regards to those who partake, as long as you are sober.

Changing who is a prohibited person is only limited to the 5CA:

"Just as there was no historical justification for disarming a citizen of sound mind, there is no tradition that supports disarming a sober citizen who is not currently under an impairing influence," Smith wrote. "Indeed, it is helpful to compare the tradition surrounding the insane and the tradition surrounding the intoxicated side-by-side."

The federal statute applied not only when a person is intoxicated but also when they are sober and in possession of a controlled substance.

The opinion goes on to suggest that the founders "institutionalized the insane and stripped them of their guns; but they allowed alcoholics to possess firearms while sober."

Federal gun law used in Hunter Biden case voided by appeals court

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit on Wednesday voided a federal law preventing unlawful drug users from possessing guns, citing the Supreme Court's landmark decision from last year.

www.washingtonexaminer.com