The polymer guns might not last as long as a metal one, but for $500K in material - you can print a lot of them
$500K is for the printer. The powered metal is not the expensive part per my understanding.
The polymer guns might not last as long as a metal one, but for $500K in material - you can print a lot of them
How much did that cost?
$500K is for the printer. The powered metal is not the expensive part per my understanding.
Republican House, this is going to expire. Let freedom ring.
Also, bullets are metal as are firing pins. This whole, “Er meh Gawd! Plaztic Gunz will let the terrorizt winz!” comments are retarded. Terrorists gave up on getting on planes a long time ago. They use bombs, gun free zones, and large crowds to their advantage now.
Clarification:
$1500 for a 3D polymer printer + $500K material = a lot of guns
$500K for a metal printer = 1 gun
Apples, avocados. And misses the big picture. Polymer printing technology is well-developed and just now hitting commodity status. Metal printing technology I'm referencing is one-off proof of concept. And it works. Think economy of scale down the road and endless uses beyond firearms. You could print your own parts for machinery, tools, motors/engines, braces/brackets, boxes/cases/enclosures, etc. The possibilities and business opportunities are endless. I use polymer printers in my profession. While useful for prototypes and fragile test fitting, absolutely nothing beats metal, with (expensive) injection-molded thermoplastics coming in second.
It's two notches easier than making a CAT scan machine.
Republican House, this is going to expire. Let freedom ring.
I'm wondering out loud (NOT making a suggestion) that this may be an opportunity to do some horse-trading with the antis. Federal legislation has always gone one way-against us. Is there a chance to turn this?
While I don't think there was anything that a majority of us were willing to accept in exchange for extending the UNACCEPTABLE AWB as it was getting ready to expire, is there something we may be willing to take in trade for extending the undetectible firearms act? Universal concealed carry, for example? I'm sure most will say NO, though I just wanted to start a lively discussion.
I'm wondering out loud (NOT making a suggestion) that this may be an opportunity to do some horse-trading with the antis. Federal legislation has always gone one way-against us. Is there a chance to turn this?
While I don't think there was anything that a majority of us were willing to accept in exchange for extending the UNACCEPTABLE AWB as it was getting ready to expire, is there something we may be willing to take in trade for extending the undetectible firearms act? Universal concealed carry, for example? I'm sure most will say NO, though I just wanted to start a lively discussion.
Short answer no. They have nothing to trade. After the court rules we will have ss or is and then we can talk. If we do not have is or ss the discussion moves to constitutional convention.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT GUNS. ITS ABOUT LIMITED GOVERNMENT.
Lively enough for ya?
How hard is it to make a 3d printer?