The ATT has been mentioned here several times over the last few years. In the latest meeting they went after ammo, and did it in a DIRTY way. It will infuriate you.
Quoted below is the intro. Everyone should take the time to read the entire article.
Most will agree that the US needs to take strong action against the UN for these dirty tactics, and either defund or withdraw from it.
https://www.nraila.org/articles/201...-expand-un-regulations-to-ammunition-continue
Quoted below is the intro. Everyone should take the time to read the entire article.
Most will agree that the US needs to take strong action against the UN for these dirty tactics, and either defund or withdraw from it.
Shortly before 4:00am last Saturday morning, the two week long Third Review Conference (RevCon3) on the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat, and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects (PoA) finally came to end.
Entering into the meeting several critical issues were on the agenda, none of which was more significant than attempts to include ammunition into the fold of the PoA. Getting ammunition into the PoA has been at the top of the anti-firearms agenda since the PoA’s inception in 2001, as it opens the door for calls to mark, trace, limit and require global register of its users. To understand this, you must recognize that everything at the U.N. must be viewed not in the present, but in the future, and just like the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) it is never about what is in the document when it is initially adopted, but what that language will allow it to become. Ammunition was the real issue at RevCon3, as including it in the PoA would mark an even more significant step forward in the anti-firearm agenda of the U.N. than the adoption of the ATT.
https://www.nraila.org/articles/201...-expand-un-regulations-to-ammunition-continue